The Supreme Court and the President's Power
最高法院與總統的權力
Introduction
The Supreme Court made new rules about the President. Now, the President can fire more people in government agencies.
最高法院制定了關於總統的新規則。現在總統可以解雇更多政府機構的人員。
Main Body
The Court says the President can fire leaders of many government groups. He does not need a special reason to do this. This gives the President more control.
法院表示總統可以解雇許多政府機構的領導人。他不需要特殊理由即可這樣做。這賦予了總統更多控制權。
However, the Federal Reserve is different. The Court says the President cannot fire its leaders easily. This keeps the bank's money rules safe from politics.
然而，聯準會則有所不同。法院表示總統不能輕易解雇其領導人。這能確保銀行的貨幣規則不受政治影響。
The Court also talked about other things. They said Mississippi can count mail-in votes from Election Day. Also, Donald Trump must pay $5 million to E. Jean Carroll.
法院還討論了其他事項。他們表示密西西比州可以計算選舉日的郵寄選票。此外，川普必須向 E. Jean Carroll 支付 500 萬美元。
Conclusion
The President now has more power over government workers, but the Federal Reserve stays independent.
總統現在對政府人員擁有更多權力，但聯準會依然保持獨立。
Vocabulary Learning
⚡ The Power of 'CAN' vs 'CANNOT'
In this text, we see how to talk about permission and ability. For A2 learners, this is the fastest way to describe rules.
The Pattern:
Subject + can/cannot + action
Examples from the text:
- President can fire people. ✅ (He is allowed to)
- President cannot fire bank leaders. ❌ (He is not allowed to)
Quick Tip: In English, we don't say "can not" (two words) as often as we say cannot (one word) or can't in a formal report.
Real-world use:
- "I can speak English."
- "I cannot go to the party."