US Court Changes Rules for Election Money
美國法院更改選舉資金規則
Introduction
The US Supreme Court changed a law. Now, political parties can spend more money to help candidates.
美國最高法院更改了一項法律。現在政黨可以花更多錢來幫助候選人。
Main Body
Six judges said the old law was wrong. They said the law stopped free speech. The old law started in 1971. It stopped rich people from giving too much money to candidates.
六位法官表示舊法是不正確的。他們認為該法律限制了言論自由。舊法始於 1971 年,旨在防止富人向候選人提供過多資金。
Now, parties can spend more money. This is good for parties because they pay less for TV ads. More money will move from small groups to big political parties.
現在,政黨可以花更多錢。這對政黨是有利的,因為他們在電視廣告上的支出將減少。更多資金將從小型團體流向大型政黨。
Some people are happy. They say this is about free speech. Other people are sad. They say rich people now have too much power in elections.
有些人感到高興,認為這關乎言論自由。而有些人則感到難過,認為富人在選舉中現在擁有了過多權力。
Conclusion
Money is now more important in US elections. Political parties have more power than before.
金錢現在在美國選舉中變得更加重要。政黨擁有的權力比以前更多。
Vocabulary Learning
⚖️ The Power of 'More'
In this text, we see a pattern for comparing things. When we want to say something is extra or higher than before, we use More + Noun.
Look at these examples:
- ...spend more money
- ...more power
- ...more important
How it works: Normal More Money More money Power More power
🚩 Contrasting Feelings
The text uses two simple adjectives to show a disagreement. This is a great way for A2 learners to describe opinions:
Happy Sad
- "Some people are happy." (Positive feeling )
- "Other people are sad." (Negative feeling )
🕰️ Time Words
Notice how the text moves from the past to now:
- The old law (1971) Past
- Now (Today) Present