Problem for Sheriff Chris Nanos
Introduction
The Pima County Board of Supervisors did not fire Sheriff Chris Nanos. But they sent a report to the state attorney general. They say he lied.
Main Body
Sheriff Nanos said he never lost his job in the past. But old papers from Texas say he did. He left a police job in 1982 because he did not follow rules. Some leaders say he is dangerous. One leader tried to remove Nanos from his job. This did not work because the law is difficult. However, four leaders voted to tell the state attorney general about the lies. Also, a woman named Nancy Guthrie is missing. The police did not find her for 100 days. Nanos and the FBI are angry with each other. Some leaders want the FBI to take the case.
Conclusion
Sheriff Nanos is still the Sheriff. Now the state attorney general will look at the lies and the missing woman case.
Learning
The 'Past' Secret
To reach A2, you need to talk about things that already happened. This story uses the Simple Past to tell us about the Sheriff.
1. The 'Did Not' Pattern
When we say something didn't happen, we use: did not + action.
- did not fire → (They didn't do it)
- did not follow → (He didn't obey)
- did not work → (It failed)
- did not find → (She is still missing)
2. Regular Actions (The -ed ending) Watch how words change when they move to the past:
- Lie → Lied
- Vote → Voted
3. The Tricky Word: 'Left' Some words change completely. We don't say 'leaved'. We say left.
- He left a police job → (He walked away from it in 1982)
Quick Tip: Use did not for any action you want to deny in the past. It is the simplest way to be clear!