Harvey Weinstein Trial Ends Without a Decision
Introduction
A jury in New York cannot agree if Harvey Weinstein is guilty of rape. The judge stopped the trial.
Main Body
Jessica Mann said Weinstein raped her in a hotel in 2013. The lawyers for the state said Weinstein used his power to force her. The lawyers for Weinstein said the sex was okay. This is the third time the court tried this case. In 2020, a court said he was guilty, but a higher court changed that. In 2025, another trial also failed. Alvin Bragg is the city lawyer. He is sad about the result. Weinstein's lawyers say the jury is not sure he did it. They want the case to stop. Weinstein is still in prison. He has a 16-year sentence from California. He is also guilty of another crime in New York.
Conclusion
The court will meet in late June. They will decide if there is a fourth trial.
Learning
π Talking about the Past
In this story, we see a very common way to talk about things that already happened. We use -ed at the end of action words.
Look at these changes:
- Stop β Stopped
- Rape β Raped
- Use β Used
Why do this? When you see -ed, the action is finished. It is not happening now; it happened in 2013, 2020, or 2025.
βοΈ Who is who? (Simple Nouns)
- The Judge β The boss of the court.
- The Jury β The group of people who decide.
- The Lawyer β The person who speaks for the state or the prisoner.
Pattern:
The [Person] + is/was + [Feeling/Status]
Example: The lawyer β is β sad. Example: Weinstein β is β in prison.