Recently, several student-athletes have started using the civil court system to challenge the NCAA's decisions regarding their eligibility to play.

最近，有幾位學生運動員開始利用民事法院系統，挑戰 NCAA 關於其參賽資格的決定。

The process of deciding who is eligible to play has moved toward the courts, as seen in the cases of Dean Miller and Jackson Carsello. Mr. Miller, a former player for the University of Kansas, has asked the court for an emergency order to stop the NCAA's decision. He argues that the NCAA's refusal to give him an extra year of eligibility is unfair compared to other athletes in similar situations, such as Diego Pavia. Furthermore, Mr. Miller emphasizes that this decision has caused him a significant financial loss, specifically a $300,000 NIL payment that depends on his eligibility.

決定誰具有參賽資格的過程已轉向法院，正如 Dean Miller 和 Jackson Carsello 的案例所示。前堪薩斯大學球員 Mr. Miller 已請求法院發出緊急命令以停止 NCAA 的決定。他主張 NCAA 拒絕給予他額外一年的參賽資格，與其他處於類似情況的運動員（如 Diego Pavia）相比是不公平的。此外，Mr. Miller 強調此決定導致他遭受重大財務損失，特別是一筆 30 萬美元、取決於其參賽資格的 NIL 款項。

At the same time, a court in Cook County has ruled in favor of Northwestern player Jackson Carsello. Judge Neil Cohen decided that Mr. Carsello should be allowed to play an additional season in 2026. This decision overruled the NCAA's claim that Mr. Carsello's 2021 ankle injuries did not stop him from playing. The judge relied on testimony from coaches who confirmed that the athlete's condition made playing dangerous. Consequently, the court concluded that the potential harm to the athlete was more important than the NCAA's regulations.

與此同時，庫克郡的一家法院裁定西北大學球員 Jackson Carsello 勝訴。法官 Neil Cohen 決定 Mr. Carsello 應獲准在 2026 年多參加一個賽季。這項決定推翻了 NCAA 的主張，即 Mr. Carsello 在 2021 年的腳踝受傷並未阻止他參賽。法官依據教練的證詞，確認該運動員的狀況使得參賽具有危險性。因此，法院結論認為，對運動員潛在的傷害比 NCAA 的規定更為重要。

While Mr. Carsello has successfully won his eligibility for the 2026 season, the court's decision for Mr. Miller is still pending.

雖然 Mr. Carsello 已成功贏回 2026 年賽季的參賽資格，但法院對 Mr. Miller 的決定仍在待定中。