The first Prime Minister's Questions session after the resignation of Sir Keir Starmer was marked by serious verbal arguments between the Leader of the Opposition and government ministers.

在基爾·斯塔默爵士辭職後的首次「首相問答時間」中，反對黨黨魁與政府部長之間爆發了嚴重的口角。

The session took place during a change of leadership within the Labour Party, with Andy Burnham seen as the main candidate for the next Prime Minister. Usually, there is a period of cooperation between the outgoing leader and the opposition; however, Kemi Badenoch ignored this tradition and chose an aggressive approach instead. Consequently, she launched several attacks against cabinet members, claiming that Chancellor Rachel Reeves had harmed employment and that Energy Secretary Ed Miliband had damaged industrial stability.

此次會議在工黨領導層更替期間舉行，Andy Burnham 被視為下一任首相的主要候選人。通常在前任領袖與反對黨之間會有一個合作期；然而，Kemi Badenoch 忽略了這一傳統，反而採取了激進的做法。因此，她對內閣成員發起多次攻擊，聲稱財政大臣 Rachel Reeves 損害了就業，而能源大臣 Ed Miliband 則破壞了工業穩定。

Significant tension developed between Badenoch and Education Secretary Bridget Phillipson. The Leader of the Opposition described Phillipson as a 'spiteful class warrior,' arguing that adding VAT to private school fees had caused instability in education. This led to a warning from Speaker Sir Lindsay Hoyle, who told the members to behave professionally to avoid setting a bad example for the public. Furthermore, reports suggest that the arguments continued in the hallways after the session. Labour sources claim that Badenoch continued her insults, whereas Conservative sources insist that the Education Secretary started the fight.

Badenoch 與教育大臣 Bridget Phillipson 之間產生了嚴重的緊張關係。反對黨黨魁將 Phillipson 描述為一名「充滿惡意的階級鬥士」，認為在私立學校學費中增加加值稅 (VAT) 導致了教育體系的不穩定。這導致議長 Sir Lindsay Hoyle 發出警告，要求議員們表現專業，以免為大眾樹立不良榜樣。此外，有報告指出會議結束後，走廊中仍有爭執。工黨消息人士稱 Badenoch 繼續進行侮辱，而保守黨消息人士則堅持是教育大臣先挑起爭端。

In contrast to the opposition's tone, Sir Keir Starmer used the session to defend his government's achievements. He emphasized Phillipson's success in promoting social mobility and asserted that his administration had reduced austerity and managed global crises, such as the conflict in Iran. Starmer concluded by stating that the country was in a better position under his leadership. Despite these events and criticism from others like Ed Davey regarding a lack of empathy, the Conservative leadership has refused to apologize for their language.

與反對黨的口吻相反，基爾·斯塔默爵士利用此次會議為其政府的成就辯護。他強調 Phillipson 在促進社會流動性方面的成功，並聲稱其政府減少了緊縮政策，並妥善處理了如伊朗衝突等全球危機。斯塔默最後表示，在他的領導下，國家處於更好的地位。儘管發生了這些事件，且 Ed Davey 等人批評其缺乏同理心，但保守黨領導層仍拒絕為其言論道歉。

The session ended with a clear ideological divide, leaving the outgoing Prime Minister's record defended by his party and the opposition's behavior under criticism.

會議在明顯的意識形態分歧中結束，前首相的政績得到了黨內捍衛，而反對黨的行為則受到批評。