Recent court cases in Singapore and India have led to convictions for crimes involving sexual violence and the illegal sharing of private, intimate photos.

新加坡與印度近期的法院案件，已導致涉嫌性暴力及非法分享私密影像的罪犯被定罪。

In Singapore, Abdul Marzuq Waliyuddin Abdul Majid was sentenced to 32 months in prison and two strokes of the cane for intentionally sharing intimate images. The court found that the defendant acted because the victim refused to restart a relationship with him. He pretended to be her on social media to share explicit content in groups that targeted women in religious clothing. The judge emphasized that this was a planned attempt to humiliate the victim, which caused her severe emotional distress and social isolation. Fortunately, the victim's own secret investigation helped the police identify the man and close the illegal group.

在新加坡，Abdul Marzuq Waliyuddin Abdul Majid 因故意分享私密影像被判處 32 個月監禁及兩次鞭打。法院發現被告是因為受害者拒絕與他重新開始關係才採取行動。他在社群媒體上冒充受害者，在針對著宗教服裝女性的群組中分享露骨內容。法官強調，這是一次蓄意企圖羞辱受害者，導致其承受嚴重的精神痛苦與社交孤立。幸而受害者自身的秘密調查幫助警方識別該男子並取締了非法群組。

Meanwhile, in Pune, India, a special court convicted 65-year-old Bhimrao Kamble for the kidnapping, rape, and murder of a three-and-a-half-year-old girl. The prosecution provided strong evidence, including DNA tests, CCTV footage, and medical reports showing 18 injuries. Because a special 15-member team handled the investigation, the conviction happened quickly, within 55 days of the crime. The court described the crime as one of the 'rarest of rare' cases due to the extreme brutality and the defendant's lack of regret. The final sentence is still being decided based on legal precedents regarding the death penalty.

同時，在印度浦那，特別法院裁定 65 歲的 Bhimrao Kamble 綁架、強姦及謀殺一名三歲半女童罪名成立。控方提供了強力證據，包括 DNA 檢測、CCTV 影像以及顯示有 18 處傷口的醫療報告。由於由一個 15 人的特別小組負責調查，因此在案發 55 天內迅速定罪。法院形容此案因極端殘暴且被告毫無悔意，屬於「極少數中的極少數」案件。最終量刑仍根據關於死刑的法律先例決定中。

Furthermore, another case in India resulted in a 20-year prison sentence for a man who sexually assaulted a 16-year-old relative. The court stated that the victim's testimony was consistent and believable. It concluded that the defendant used threats of violence to keep the victim silent, which was a serious violation of family trust.

此外，印度的另一宗案件導致一名性侵 16 歲親戚的男子被判處 20 年監禁。法院指出受害者的證詞一致且可信。法院結論認為被告利用暴力威脅使受害者保持沉默，嚴重違反家庭信任。

These cases show how strict legal systems are being used to fight sexual violence and digital harassment in different countries.

這些案例顯示了不同國家如何利用嚴格的法律系統來打擊性暴力與數位騷擾。