The WNBA has released a special poster to celebrate its 30th anniversary. However, the image has caused a lot of public debate because several famous athletes were left out.

WNBA 發佈了一張特別海報以慶祝其 30 週年。然而，由於幾位著名運動員被排除在外，該圖像引起了許多大眾爭論。

The controversy began after WinCraft, a company owned by Fanatics, published the promotional image. Many fans were surprised that Caitlin Clark, a star player for the Indiana Fever, was not included. Because Clark has significantly increased TV viewership and ticket sales, people were confused why her teammate, Sophie Cunningham, was chosen instead. Consequently, this decision led to a wave of criticism on social media.

爭議始於 Fanatics 旗下的 WinCraft 公司發佈該宣傳圖像之後。許多球迷對印第安納狂熱隊球星 Caitlin Clark 未被納入感到驚訝。由於 Clark 顯著提升了電視收視率與門票銷售額，人們不明白為何選擇她的隊友 Sophie Cunningham 而非她。因此，這一決定在社群媒體上引起了一波批評。

Furthermore, observers noticed that many league legends were also missing from the artwork. This includes all-time great players such as Diana Taurasi, Sue Bird, and Sheryl Swoopes. Since these athletes helped build the league's history, many are now questioning how the WNBA and its partners chose which players to feature.

此外，觀察者注意到許多聯盟傳奇人物也從藝術作品中消失了。這包括如 Diana Taurasi、Sue Bird 和 Sheryl Swoopes 等史上最偉大的球員。由於這些運動員協助建立了聯盟的歷史，許多人現在質疑 WNBA 及其合作夥伴是如何選擇要呈現哪些球員的。

Some experts suggest that these omissions were not intentional. Instead, the problem might be caused by contractual issues. For example, some players may not have signed licensing agreements with Fanatics to allow the use of their images. If this is true, the controversy is likely the result of an administrative mistake rather than a deliberate attempt to ignore certain players.

一些專家建議這些遺漏並非刻意為之。相反，問題可能是由合約問題引起的。例如，某些球員可能尚未與 Fanatics 簽署授權協議以允許使用其影像。如果事實如此，該爭議很可能是行政錯誤的結果，而非刻意忽略特定球員。

What started as a celebration has instead become a debate about how athletes are represented and how commercial licenses work.

原本是一場慶祝活動，結果反而變成一場關於運動員如何被呈現，以及商業授權如何運作的辯論。