The Supreme Court of the United States has made several decisions that give the Trump administration more power to limit asylum access, end humanitarian protections, and make it easier to deport legal permanent residents.

美國最高法院做出數項裁決，賦予川普政府更多權力來限制庇護獲准、終止人道主義保護，並使驅逐合法永久居民變得更容易。

In the case of Mullin v. Al Otro Lado, the Court decided by a 6-3 majority that people have not 'arrived' in the US until they physically enter the country. This means border officials can use 'metering' policies to block asylum seekers from entering to avoid processing their claims. Justice Samuel Alito emphasized that the law should be read based on physical entry. However, Justice Sonia Sotomayor argued that this decision encourages illegal entry and ignores the humanitarian goals of the 1980 Refugee Act.

在 Mullin v. Al Otro Lado 案中，法院以 6 比 3 的多數票決定，人們在身體上進入美國之前並不視為「到達」美國。這意味著邊境官員可以使用「分流」政策來阻止庇護申請者進入，以避免處理其申請。大法官 Samuel Alito 強調，法律應根據身體進入來解讀。然而，大法官 Sonia Sotomayor 主張此決定鼓勵非法入境，並無視了 1980 年《難民法》的人道主義目標。

At the same time, the Court ruled that the government has the authority to end Temporary Protected Status (TPS) for about 350,000 Haitians and 6,100 Syrians. The majority stated that the law prevents courts from reviewing the Secretary of Homeland Security's decisions on this matter. Justice Elena Kagan disagreed, asserting that the decision to remove protections for Haitians was based on racial prejudice. The majority rejected this claim, stating the decision was based on policy rather than race.

同時，法院裁定政府有權終止約 35 萬名海地人和 6,100 名敘利亞人的臨時保護狀態 (TPS)。多數意見指出，法律禁止法院審查國土安全部部長在此事上的決定。大法官 Elena Kagan 不同意此觀點，並主張取消海地人保護的決定是基於種族偏見。多數派駁回了這一說法，稱該決定是基於政策而非種族。

Furthermore, in Blanche v. Muk Choi Lau, the Court ruled that border officials do not need strong evidence of criminal activity to treat a returning permanent resident as an 'applicant for admission.' This makes it easier to start deportation proceedings. Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson warned that this gives the government too much power and could threaten the security of millions of legal residents. Consequently, White House adviser Stephen Miller stated that the US is now 'completely closed' to asylum seekers.

此外，在 Blanche v. Muk Choi Lau 案中，法院裁定邊境官員不需要強而有力的犯罪活動證據，即可將一名返回的永久居民視為「入境申請人」。這使得啟動驅逐程序變得更加容易。大法官 Ketanji Brown Jackson 警告，這賦予政府過多權力，可能會威脅數百萬合法居民的安全。因此，白宮顧問 Stephen Miller 表示，美國現在對庇護申請者「完全關閉」。

These judicial decisions show a major shift toward giving the executive branch more control over immigration, making it faster for the government to remove migrants and limit legal entry.

這些司法決定顯示出一個重大轉向，即賦予行政部門更多對移民的控制權，使政府能更快地驅逐移民並限制合法入境。