The governments of Lebanon and Israel have signed a framework agreement organized by the United States to end fighting in southern Lebanon. However, the deal faces strong internal opposition and immediate military problems.

黎巴嫩與以色列政府在美國的安排下簽署了一份框架協議，旨在結束黎巴嫩南部的戰鬥。然而，該協議面臨強烈的內部反對以及緊迫的軍事問題。

The agreement followed five rounds of talks in Washington after a period of instability starting in March. This conflict was caused by Hezbollah's reaction to the death of Iranian leader Ali Khamenei, leading to over 4,200 Lebanese deaths and the displacement of one million people. The 14-point deal states that Israel has no territorial claims to Lebanon. However, Israel will only fully withdraw its forces if non-state armed groups, especially Hezbollah, are disarmed. To start this process, the Lebanese Armed Forces (LAF) will take control of two pilot zones while Israel monitors the situation.

該協議是在三月開始動盪後，經過在華盛頓五輪談判後達成的。此次衝突是由於真主黨對伊朗領袖哈梅內去世的反應而引起，導致超過 4,200 名黎巴嫩人死亡，以及一百萬人流離失所。這項 14 點協議規定以色列對黎巴嫩沒有領土要求。然而，以色列僅在非國家武裝團體（尤其是真主黨）解除武裝後，才會全面撤軍。為了啟動這一過程，黎巴嫩軍隊 (LAF) 將接管兩個試點區域，而以色列則負責監控情況。

There are deep disagreements regarding the deal. Prime Minister Nawaf Salam and President Joseph Aoun emphasized that the agreement is the main way to restore Lebanon's independence. On the other hand, Hezbollah leader Naim Qassem declared the deal invalid. He asserted that linking the withdrawal of troops to disarmament is a surrender of sovereignty. Furthermore, Hezbollah claims that a separate agreement between the US and Iran provides better protection and a guaranteed end to hostilities.

對於該協議存在深層分歧。總理 Nawaf Salam 與總統 Joseph Aoun 強調，該協議是恢復黎巴嫩獨立的主要途徑。另一方面，真主黨領袖 Naim Qassem 宣布協議無效。他聲稱將撤軍與解除武裝掛鉤是放棄主權。此外，真主黨主張美國與伊朗之間的一份單獨協議能提供更好的保護並確保停止敵對行動。

Many experts doubt if the agreement can actually be enforced. Analysts have noted that the US cannot be a neutral mediator because it strongly supports Israel. Additionally, the deal lacks a clear timetable for Israeli withdrawal, which critics say is a major weakness. This instability was clear immediately after the signing, as the Israeli military began operations to destroy Hezbollah tunnels and infrastructure, which the Israeli government justified as necessary for security.

許多專家懷疑該協議實際上是否能被執行。分析人士指出，美國無法成為中立的調解人，因為其強烈支持以色列。此外，協議缺乏以色列撤軍的明確時間表，批評者認為這是一個重大缺陷。簽署後不穩定情況立即顯現，以色列軍方開始行動摧毀真主黨的隧道與基礎設施，以色列政府將其解釋為安全之必要。

The agreement remains unstable due to ongoing military actions and a complete lack of agreement between the Lebanese government and Hezbollah.

由於軍事行動持續，以及黎巴嫩政府與真主黨之間完全缺乏共識，該協議依然不穩定。