The United States Supreme Court has ruled that the government can move forward with ending Temporary Protected Status (TPS) for people from Haiti and Syria.

美國最高法院已裁定，政府可以繼續推進終止海地與敘利亞人士的臨時保護身份 (TPS)。

The Court decided that the Secretary of Homeland Security has the main power to decide whether to grant or cancel TPS. This ruling cancels previous decisions by lower courts that had stopped the process for about 330,000 people. Consequently, the administration now has the legal freedom to potentially end TPS for other groups, including people from Lebanon, El Salvador, Sudan, and Ukraine, whose status is set to expire later this year.

法院決定國土安全部部長擁有決定是否授予或取消 TPS 的主要權力。此裁決推翻了先前下級法院停止約 33 萬人程序之決定。因此，政府現在在法律上具有自由，可能終止其他群體的 TPS，包括來自黎巴嫩、薩爾瓦多、蘇丹與烏克蘭的人士，其身份將於今年晚些時候到期。

TPS was created in 1990 to protect people from deportation if their home countries faced war, natural disasters, or extreme instability. Although the program allows people to work, it does not provide a direct way to become a permanent resident. Advocacy groups emphasize that many people have lived in the U.S. for over twenty years and are now fully integrated into society. However, the Department of Homeland Security argues that the program was always meant to be temporary. Secretary Markwayne Mullin asserted that beneficiaries should have looked for other legal ways to stay in the U.S. during their time there.

TPS 於 1990 年創立，旨在保護原居國面臨戰爭、自然災害或極端不穩定而無法回國的人免於被驅逐。雖然該計畫允許人士工作，但並未提供直接成為永久居民的途徑。倡議團體強調，許多人已在美國生活超過二十年，且已完全融入社會。然而，國土安全部主張該計畫向來僅為臨時性質。部長 Markwayne Mullin 斷言，受益人在留美期間應尋找其他合法留居途徑。

There are also several practical and legal problems. The government has suggested giving financial help to those who leave voluntarily and using special flights to avoid travel restrictions in dangerous areas. Nevertheless, critics point out a contradiction: the government wants to deport people to Haiti, even though the State Department warns citizens 'Do Not Travel' there. Furthermore, because there is no clear legal path from TPS to permanent residency, affected non-citizens have very few legal options left.

此外還存在若干實際與法律問題。政府建議向自願離境者提供財務援助，並利用專機以避開危險地區的旅行限制。儘管如此，批評者指出其中存在矛盾：政府希望將人遣返回海地，儘管國務院警告公民「請勿前往」該地。此外，由於從 TPS 轉為永久居留權缺乏明確的法律路徑，受影響的非公民僅剩極少法律選項。

The Supreme Court ruling has removed the legal obstacles to ending TPS, meaning the status of hundreds of thousands of people now depends on the government's decisions.

最高法院的裁決移除了終止 TPS 的法律障礙，這意味著數十萬人的身份現在取決於政府的決定。