The U.S. House of Representatives has voted against a proposal that aimed to restrict the president's power to send military forces into conflicts within Lebanon.

美國眾議院投票否決了一項旨在限制總統派遣軍隊進入黎巴嫩衝突地區權力的提案。

The proposal, led by Representative Rashida Tlaib, wanted to require the U.S. military to leave Lebanese conflicts within seven days. This version of the plan was an improvement on an earlier draft. While the first draft called for a total withdrawal from Lebanon, the new version allowed the U.S. to keep protecting diplomatic buildings and continuing security work with the Lebanese Armed Forces. Democratic leaders, including Hakeem Jeffries, supported this change, emphasizing that the new language protected national security interests.

這項由眾議員 Rashida Tlaib 領導的提案，要求美國軍隊在七天內撤離黎巴嫩衝突地區。此版本的計劃較早前的草案有所改善。雖然第一份草案要求完全撤出黎巴嫩，但新版本允許美國繼續保護外交建築，並與黎巴嫩軍隊繼續進行安全工作。包括 Hakeem Jeffries 在內的民主黨領導人支持這一改變，強調新措辭保護了國家安全利益。

There were strong disagreements among lawmakers about whether this measure was necessary. Supporters, such as Representative Gregory Meeks, argued that the plan was a necessary safeguard to prevent the U.S. from getting involved in long wars without permission. On the other hand, critics led by Brian Mast argued that the plan was unnecessary because the U.S. is not currently conducting combat operations in the region. Furthermore, Republicans claimed that the resolution would actually help Hezbollah, the group that refuses to disarm under the recent ceasefire agreement.

立法者對於這項措施是否必要存在強烈分歧。支持者（如眾議員 Gregory Meeks）認為，該計劃是必要的保障，可防止美國在未經許可的情況下捲入長期戰爭。另一方面，由 Brian Mast 領導的批評者則認為該計劃是不必要的，因為美國目前並未在該地區進行戰鬥行動。此外，共和黨人聲稱該決議實際上將對真主黨有利，而該組織在最近的停火協議下拒絕解除武裝。

Global politics also played a major role in the debate. Although the U.S. has tried to improve relations with Iran, a final peace deal depends on Israeli forces leaving the area. However, Israel will only withdraw if Hezbollah disarms, which the group has refused to do. In this environment, Representative Tlaib described the Israeli military actions in southern Lebanon as an attempt at ethnic cleansing, whereas her opponents argued that her proposal provided strategic support for Hezbollah.

全球政治在辯論中也扮演了重要角色。儘管美國嘗試改善與伊朗的關係，但最終的和平協議取決於以色列軍隊撤離該地區。然而，以色列僅在真主黨解除武裝的情況下才會撤出，而該組織已拒絕這樣做。在這種環境下，眾議員 Tlaib 將以色列在黎巴嫩南部的軍事行動描述為一種種族清洗的嘗試，而她的反對者則認為她的提案為真主黨提供了戰略支持。

The resolution failed with 189 votes in favor and 235 against, meaning the president keeps his current military authority in Lebanon.

該決議案以 189 票贊成、235 票反對而被否決，意味著總統保留目前在黎巴嫩的軍事權限。