The United States House of Representatives has passed a bipartisan set of laws designed to improve online safety for children, although this plan differs greatly from earlier proposals in the Senate.

美國眾議院通過了一套由兩黨支持的法律，旨在提升兒童的網路安全，不過該方案與參議院早前提出之建議大相徑庭。

There is currently a conflict between the Senate's Kids Online Safety Act (KOSA) and the House-passed Kids Internet and Digital Safety (KIDS) Act. The KOSA plan is based on a "duty of care," which would legally force platforms to reduce predictable risks, such as online predators and the promotion of self-harm. Supporters, including Representative Brandon Guffey, emphasize that companies often prioritize user engagement over safety, and therefore federal laws are necessary to protect children and support parents.

目前參議院的《兒童網路安全法》(KOSA) 與眾議院通過的《兒童網路與數位安全》(KIDS) 法案之間存在衝突。KOSA 方案基於「注意義務」，將在法律上強制平台降低可預見的風險，例如網路掠奪者及促成自殘的內容。包括眾議員 Brandon Guffey 在內的支持者強調，公司通常將用戶參與度置於安全之上，因此有必要制定聯邦法律以保護兒童並支持家長。

In contrast, the House-approved version has a more limited focus. This legislation requires age verification for adult content, limits the use of children's data for targeted ads, and requires AI chatbots to admit they are not human. However, some Senate members, such as Senator Maria Cantwell, have criticized this version. She asserted that removing the "duty of care" makes the protections much less effective.

相較之下，眾議院通過的版本焦點較為有限。該立法要求成人內容需經過年齡驗證，限制將兒童數據用於定向廣告，並要求 AI 聊天機器人承認其非人類身分。然而，部分參議員（如參議員 Maria Cantwell）對此版本提出批評。她主張移除「注意義務」會使保護措施的成效大打折扣。

Different groups hold very different views on these laws. Digital rights organizations and industry groups, such as NetChoice, argue that age-verification tools could cause a loss of privacy and violate First Amendment rights. They suggest that these rules might lead to stricter access for all users. Consequently, it is unclear if the House and Senate will agree, as their different views on government oversight and free speech create significant obstacles.

不同團體對這些法律持有截然不同的看法。數位權利組織與業界團體（如 NetChoice）認為，年齡驗證工具可能會導致隱私流失，並違反憲法第一修正案的權利。他們認為這些規則可能會導致所有使用者的存取限制變得更加嚴格。因此，眾議院與參議院是否能達成共識尚不明朗，因為雙方對政府監管與言論自由的不同看法構成了重大障礙。

The safety package passed by the House will now go to the Senate, where the lack of strong regulations may prevent it from becoming law.

眾議院通過的安全方案現在將移交至參議院，但由於缺乏強而有力的監管，可能會導致其無法正式成為法律。