The Middle East is currently experiencing a fragile peace. This situation is managed by a June 17 agreement (MoU) between the United States and Iran, as well as a separate three-way framework involving Israel and Lebanon.

中東目前正處於一種脆弱的和平狀態。這種情況是由美國與伊朗於 6 月 17 日達成的協議（諒解備忘錄），以及以色列與黎巴嫩另一個三方框架所維持。

The main diplomatic effort focuses on a 14-point agreement intended to create a permanent truce and resolve Iran's nuclear program. However, there are still disagreements regarding Article 11, which involves the release of $12 billion in frozen assets held in Qatar. While the Trump administration offered to release $6 billion for humanitarian needs, Tehran emphasized that the full release of these funds is necessary before further political talks can happen. Furthermore, there are conflicting reports about meetings in Doha; the U.S. asserted that Iran requested a high-level meeting, whereas the Iranian government claimed they only sent technical teams to speak with Qatari mediators.

外交上的主要努力集中在一份 14 點協議上，旨在建立永久停戰並解決伊朗的核計畫。然而，關於第 11 條，即在卡達凍結的 120 億美元資產釋放問題，仍然存在分歧。雖然川普政府提出釋放 60 億美元用於人道主義需求，但德黑蘭強調，在進一步政治談判之前，必須全數釋放這些資金。此外，關於在多哈舉行會議的報導互有矛盾；美國聲稱是伊朗要求舉行高層會議，而伊朗政府則稱他們僅派遣技術團隊與卡達調解員接觸。

At the same time, the control of the Strait of Hormuz has become a major point of conflict. Iran claims it has the right to control the waterway and wants to introduce a fee for ships after a 60-day free period ends. In contrast, the United States argues that international maritime law must be followed to ensure free navigation. This dispute caused a series of military attacks, including Iranian strikes on commercial ships and U.S. retaliatory strikes on Iranian infrastructure. Oman has tried to help by suggesting a voluntary fee system, but some U.S. officials remain skeptical of this proposal.

與此同時，對霍爾木茲海峽的控制權已成為主要衝突點。伊朗聲稱有權控制該水域，並希望在 60 天免費期結束後對船隻收取費用。相反，美國主張必須遵守國際海事法以確保航行自由。這場爭議導致了一系列軍事攻擊，包括伊朗攻擊商船以及美國對伊朗基礎設施的報復性打擊。阿曼嘗試建議採取自願付費制度來協助，但部分美國官員對此提案仍持懷疑態度。

In the Levant, a framework between Israel, Lebanon, and the U.S. aims to end the fighting between Israel and Hezbollah. The agreement states that Israel will leave southern Lebanon only after the Lebanese Army confirms that Hezbollah has given up its weapons. Hezbollah and its allies view this as a violation of their sovereignty that could lead to a civil war. Additionally, Article 13 of the agreement prevents people from seeking legal damages in international courts, which has upset many Lebanese civilians. Meanwhile, Prime Minister Netanyahu asserted that Israeli troops will stay in the 'security zone' until all threats are removed.

在黎凡特地區，以色列、黎巴嫩與美國之間的一個框架旨在結束以色列與真主黨之間的戰鬥。協議規定，只有在黎巴嫩軍隊確認真主黨已放棄武器後，以色列才會撤出南黎巴嫩。真主黨及其盟友將此視為對其主權的侵犯，可能導致內戰。此外，協議第 13 條禁止民眾在國際法院尋求法律賠償，這引起了許多黎巴嫩平民的不滿。同時，總教練內塔尼亞胡聲稱，在所有威脅被清除之前，以色列軍隊將留在「安全區」。

The security situation in the region remains unstable. A lasting peace depends on solving the disputes over maritime borders, the disarmament of armed groups, and the transfer of frozen money.

該地區的安全情況仍然不穩定。持久的和平取決於能否解決海域邊界爭議、解除武裝團體武器以及轉移凍結資金。