India Calls for a Global Agreement on Terrorism and Strategic Cooperation at the UN
印度在聯合國呼籲就恐怖主義與戰略合作達成全球協議
Introduction
During the Ninth Review of the United Nations Global Counter-Terrorism Strategy, India's Permanent Representative, Parvathaneni Harish, called for a shared legal framework to fight global terrorism.
在聯合國全球反恐戰略第九次審議期間，印度常駐代表 Parvathaneni Harish 呼籲建立一個共同的法律框架以打擊全球恐怖主義。
Main Body
The Indian delegation emphasized the urgent need for the Comprehensive Convention on International Terrorism (CCIT), a proposal India first introduced in 1996. The representative asserted that the lack of a universally accepted legal agreement has made it difficult for countries to work together to destroy safe havens and stop the flow of weapons and money to terrorist groups. Based on India's own history with cross-border terrorism, the representative argued that no political or strategic reason can justify the use of terror.
印度代表團強調，迫切需要通過《國際恐怖主義綜合公約》（CCIT），這是印度在 1996 年首次提出的建議。代表 asserted-指出，由於缺乏一個全球公認的法律協議，導致各國難以合作摧毀恐怖分子的避風港，並阻止武器與資金流入恐怖組織。基於印度自身面對跨境恐怖主義的歷史，代表認為任何政治或戰略理由都不能將恐怖主義合理化。
Furthermore, the representative outlined six priority areas. These include removing double standards when holding countries that support terrorism accountable, strictly following Financial Action Task Force (FATF) rules to stop terror funding, and focusing on helping victims recover. India also suggested a universal approach to religious prejudice, arguing that the General Assembly should protect all faiths equally. Regarding training and support, India proposed a model that respects the independence of nations in the Global South.
此外，代表概述了六個優先領域。其中包括：在追究支持恐怖主義國家責任時消除雙重標準、嚴格遵守財務行動特別工作組（FATF）規則以截斷恐怖資金，以及專注於幫助受害者康復。印度還建議採取一種通用方式來處理宗教偏見，認為大會應平等地保護所有信仰。關於培訓與支持，印度提出了一個尊重全球南方國家獨立性的模式。
Finally, there was significant diplomatic tension regarding new technologies. The representative expressed disappointment that the General Assembly could not agree on how to handle the misuse of AI, drones, and encrypted messages. Specifically, the Indian delegation criticized the decision to leave out the Delhi Declaration from the 2023 review, stating that this was caused by narrow political interests within the Assembly.
最後，在新技術方面出現了顯著的外交緊張。代表對大會未能就如何處理 AI、無人機及加密訊息的濫用達成共識表示失望。特別是，印度代表團批評 2023 年審議中剔除《德里宣言》的決定，並指出這是由於大會內部狹隘的政治利益所導致。
Conclusion
India continues to urge the international community to stop using vague definitions and political stories, and instead create a binding and objective legal framework to fight terrorism.
印度繼續促請國際社會停止使用模糊的定義與政治說法，而是建立一個具有約束力且客觀的法律框架以打擊恐怖主義。
Vocabulary Learning
⚡ The Power of 'Strong Verbs'
At the A2 level, students usually rely on basic words like say, want, or think. To reach B2, you must replace these with Precise Verbs that convey a specific mood or intent. Look at how this text moves away from simple language:
| A2 Version (Simple) | B2 Version (From Text) | The Nuance (What it adds) |
|---|---|---|
| Said | Asserted | Shows confidence and strong belief. |
| Suggested | Proposed | Formally putting a plan forward for others to accept. |
| Told | Outlined | Organizing information into clear, structured points. |
| Complained | Criticized | Pointing out specific faults in a formal way. |
🧩 The "Cause & Effect" Connection
B2 speakers don't just list facts; they link them. Notice this specific structure from the article:
"...stating that this was caused by narrow political interests..."
Instead of saying "Political interests made this happen" (A2), the writer uses a Passive Cause structure.
Try this shift in your mind:
- A2: The rain caused the delay. B2: The delay was caused by the rain.
- A2: Lack of money stopped the project. B2: The project's failure was caused by a lack of funding.
🛠️ Vocabulary Upgrade: The 'Global' Context
To sound more professional, swap generic adjectives for these specific B2-level descriptors found in the text:
- ❌ Common ✅ Universal (Something that applies to everyone, everywhere).
- ❌ Not clear ✅ Vague (Something that lacks detail or precision).
- ❌ Important/Necessary ✅ Urgent (Something that needs action right now).
- ❌ Fair/Same ✅ Objective (Based on facts, not personal feelings).