The Australian government is suggesting a new regulatory approach called a 'Digital Duty of Care' for social media platforms. This would change the system from one that simply reacts to complaints to one that actively prevents harm.

澳洲政府建議對社群媒體平台採取一種新的監管方法，稱為「數位注意義務」。這將使系統從單純對投訴做出反應，轉變為主動防止傷害。

The proposed law aims to force technology companies to use systemic methods to reduce online harm. A major point of disagreement is the requirement for platforms to manage risks from anonymous accounts, which the government claims are used for harassment. Consequently, privacy advocates worry that this could lead to a mandatory digital identity system. They argue that such a system could put whistleblowers and survivors of domestic violence at risk.

擬議的法律旨在強制科技公司使用系統化方法來減少網路傷害。一個主要的爭議點在於要求平台管理匿名帳號帶來的風險，政府聲稱這些帳號被用於騷擾。因此，隱私倡導者擔心這可能會導致強制實施數位身分系統。他們認為，這樣的系統可能會使舉報者和家庭暴力倖存者陷入風險。

Different stakeholders have very different views on this issue. Communications Minister Anika Wells emphasized that government IDs would not be mandatory and that other reasonable options must be available. However, legal experts and policy analysts suggest that vague terms like 'serious harm' could be used to control legal speech or for political reasons. Furthermore, some industry sources claim that this proposal is simply a new version of previous misinformation laws that were abandoned.

不同的利害關係人對此問題持有截然不同的看法。通訊部長 Anika Wells 強調，政府身分證並非強制性的，且必須提供其他合理的選項。然而，法律專家和政策分析師指出，像「嚴重傷害」這樣模糊的術語可能會被用來控制合法言論或出於政治目的。此外，一些業界消息稱，這項提案僅僅是先前被放棄的錯誤訊息法的另一個版本。

Opinions on whether these measures are possible also vary. Some experts believe platforms can tell the difference between harmful bots and real anonymous users without invading privacy. On the other hand, others warn against giving the government too much power to decide what counts as 'harm.' Meanwhile, industry representatives argue that a systemic approach to risk is necessary because of how algorithms influence large platforms.

關於這些措施是否可行，意見也各不相同。一些專家認為，平台可以在不侵犯隱私的情況下，區分有害的機器人和真實的匿名用戶。另一方面，有人警告不要賦予政府過多權力來定義什麼才算作「傷害」。同時，業界代表認為，由於演算法如何影響大型平台，採取系統化的風險管理方法是必要的。

The proposal is currently in the consultation phase. It highlights a clear tension between the goal of improving public safety and the need to protect digital anonymity and free speech.

該提案目前處於諮詢階段。它突顯了提升公共安全目標與保護數位匿名性及言論自由需求之間明顯的緊張關係。