The Supreme Court of India has decided not to cancel the bail of Sonam Raghuvanshi, the main suspect in the death of her husband, Raja Raghuvanshi. This decision comes even though the judges expressed doubts about the reasoning used by the lower court.

印度最高法院決定不取消 Sonam Raghuvanshi 的保釋，她是其丈夫 Raja Raghuvanshi 死亡案件的主嫌。儘管法官對下級法院所採用的理由表示懷疑，仍做出了這項決定。

The case focuses on the death of Raja Raghuvanshi, a businessman from Indore, whose body was found in a valley in Meghalaya after a honeymoon in May 2025. The prosecution, led by Solicitor General Tushar Mehta, asserted that the murder was a planned conspiracy involving the accused and several other people. The state asked the Supreme Court to cancel the bail that the Meghalaya High Court had granted on June 29. The High Court had previously decided that the arrest process was wrong because of a typing error in the legal documents and the inclusion of irrelevant information about the accused's military status.

本案聚焦於一名來自 Indore 的商人 Raja Raghuvanshi 的死亡，其屍體在 2025 年 5 月蜜月後被發現於 Meghalaya 的一個山谷中。由律政司次長 Tushar Mehta 領導的控方堅稱，這起謀殺是一場涉及被告及其他數人的計畫陰謀。州政府要求最高法院取消 Meghalaya 高等法院在 6 月 29 日授予的保釋。高等法院此前認定逮捕程序有誤，原因是法律文件中存在打字錯誤，且包含了關於被告軍職身份的無關資訊。

During the hearing, Justices MM Sundresh and Sheel Nagu suggested that they disagreed with the High Court's decision to grant bail based on small technical errors in such a serious crime. However, the court refused to change the order because the accused had already been released and is presumed innocent until proven guilty. Furthermore, the judges noted that the trial has already started, and the facts of the case must be decided through that legal process. Meanwhile, the victim's family has requested a Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) probe, claiming that police mistakes helped the accused get free and expressing fear that witnesses might be influenced.

在聆訊期間，法官 MM Sundresh 與 Sheel Nagu 表示，他們不同意高等法院在如此嚴重的罪行中，僅因微小的技術錯誤而授予保釋的決定。然而，法院拒絕更改命令，因為被告已經獲釋，且在證明有罪前被推定為無辜。此外，法官指出審判已經開始，案件事實必須透過該法律程序來判定。與此同時，被害人家屬要求中央調查局（CBI）進行調查，聲稱警方的失誤幫助了被告獲釋，並表達對證人可能受到影響的擔憂。

In a wider context, the court mentioned other famous cases of domestic murder, such as the case of Siya Goyal and Chetan Chaudhary in Pune. The Supreme Court emphasized that there seems to be an increase in these types of violent crimes within close relationships, suggesting that society needs to examine why these patterns are occurring.

在更廣泛的背景下，法院提到其他著名的家庭謀殺案，例如 Pune 的 Siya Goyal 與 Chetan Chaudhary 案。最高法院強調，親密關係中的此類暴力犯罪似乎有所增加，建議社會需要審視為何會出現這些模式。

Sonam Raghuvanshi remains out on bail in Shillong. The Supreme Court has scheduled more hearings for July 9 to decide if the trial can be finished more quickly.

Sonam Raghuvanshi 繼續在 Shillong 保釋候審。最高法院已安排在 7 月 9 日進行更多聆訊，以決定審判是否能更快完成。