A diplomatic agreement organized by the United States aims to manage the gradual withdrawal of Israeli forces from Lebanese territory, although several government and private groups still disagree on how to implement it.

由美國組織的一份外交協議，旨在管理以色列軍隊在黎巴嫩領土的逐步撤離，雖然許多政府和私人團體對於如何執行仍有分歧。

The agreement from June 26 creates a plan for the Israeli military to leave in stages, starting with two test zones. However, because there is no fixed timetable for a full withdrawal, significant tension has developed. The deal states that further military pullbacks will only happen if the Lebanese army takes full control of security and if armed groups, specifically Hezbollah, are completely disarmed. Consequently, Hezbollah has rejected the agreement, asserting that linking the Israeli withdrawal to their own disarmament is an unacceptable demand.

6月26日的協議制定了一個以色列軍隊分階段撤離的計劃，由兩個測試區開始。然而，由於沒有全面撤離的固定時間表，導致局勢極為緊張。協議指出，只有在黎巴嫩軍隊全面掌控安全，且武裝組織（特別是真主黨）完全解除武裝後，軍隊才會進一步撤出。因此，真主黨拒絕了該協議，聲稱將以色列撤軍與其解除武裝掛鉤是一個無法接受的要求。

At the same time, human rights and media organizations have raised serious concerns about the legal side of the deal. These groups argue that certain clauses prevent victims of international crimes from seeking justice in global courts, such as the International Criminal Court. Furthermore, they emphasize that making the return of displaced people dependent on the disarmament of armed groups violates international law, which requires civilians to return home once fighting stops.

同時，人權和媒體組織對協議的法律層面表示嚴重關切。這些團體認為，某些條款阻止了國際罪行的受害者在全球法院（例如國際刑事法院）尋求正義。此外，他們強調將流離失所者的回歸與武裝組織解除武裝掛鉤，違反了國際法，因為國際法要求平民在戰鬥停止後即應返回家園。

Despite these diplomatic efforts, the situation on the ground remains unstable. Although some Israeli units have finished their missions, Israel has delayed leaving the test zones, claiming that a joint monitoring system is needed first. Meanwhile, military activity continues; Israel has carried out strikes against Hezbollah targets in Tyre and Bint Jbeil, claiming they are responding to ceasefire violations. In contrast, Lebanese authorities describe these attacks as breaches of the agreement. The humanitarian crisis is severe, with the Lebanese Health Ministry reporting 4,298 deaths and over one million displacements since March 2, though the IOM notes that about 646,107 people have started returning home.

儘管有這些外交努力，地面情況依然不穩定。雖然部分以色列部隊已完成任務，但以色列延遲離開測試區，聲稱需要先建立一套聯合監控系統。與此同時，軍事行動持續；以色列對推爾和賓特朱拜勒的真主黨目標進行打擊，聲稱是在回應違反停火協議的行為。相反，黎巴嫩當局將這些攻擊描述為違背協議。人道主義危機嚴重，黎巴嫩衛生部報告自3月2日起有4,298人死亡，超過一百萬人流離失所，不過國際移民組織（IOM）指出約有646,107人已開始返回家園。

The current situation is defined by a fragile ceasefire and a disputed withdrawal process, where diplomatic plans are weakened by ongoing military attacks and legal arguments over accountability.

目前的局勢由一個脆弱的停火和有爭議的撤軍過程定義，外交計劃被持續的軍事攻擊以及關於問責的法律爭議所削弱。