The United States Supreme Court has cancelled an executive order that tried to limit birthright citizenship. As a result, political leaders are now looking for new laws or constitutional changes to achieve their goals.

美國最高法院取消了一項試圖限制出生公民權的行政命令。因此，政治領袖現在正尋找新的法律或憲法修正案以達成其目標。

In a 6-3 decision in the case Trump v. Barbara, the Court confirmed that the 14th Amendment guarantees citizenship to anyone born in the U.S. Chief Justice John Roberts emphasized that this rule also applies to the children of immigrant parents, based on a legal precedent from 1898. Consequently, the administration's attempt to deny automatic citizenship to children of undocumented immigrants or temporary residents was rejected.

在「川普對芭芭拉」案中，法院以 6 比 3 的裁決確認第 14 修正案保障任何在美國出生的人擁有公民權。首席大法官約翰·羅伯茨強調，根據 1898 年的法律先例，此規定同樣適用於移民父母的子女。因此，政府試圖拒絕讓非法移民或臨時居民子女自動獲得公民權的嘗試被否決了。

Following this decision, House Speaker Mike Johnson and President Donald Trump suggested a change in strategy. Speaker Johnson argued that the current system allows for 'birth tourism,' which he believes weakens the value of citizenship and threatens national security. While the President believes this can be fixed through a standard new law, other conservative leaders disagree. For example, Senator Eric Schmitt argues that only a formal constitutional amendment—which requires a high level of approval from Congress and the states—would be legally valid.

在這項裁決之後，眾議院議長麥克·強森與總統川普建議改變策略。強森議長主張目前的制度導致了「生育旅遊」，他認為這削弱了公民權的價值並威脅國家安全。雖然總統認為這可以通过一項標準新法律來解決，但其他保守派領袖並不認同。例如，參議員埃里克·施密特認為，只有正式的憲法修正案（需要國會與各州的高度批准）才具有法律效力。

Birthright citizenship remains the law for now, but the focus has moved toward potential legislative or constitutional efforts to change the system.

出生公民權目前仍維持原狀，但焦點已轉向潛在的立法或憲法努力，試圖改變此制度。