Nicky Winmar Statue Removed After Criminal Convictions
Nicky Winmar 因刑事定罪而被移除雕像
Introduction
The Western Australian government has arranged for the removal of a bronze statue of former Australian Football League (AFL) player Nicky Winmar from Perth Stadium.
西澳政府已安排將前澳洲足球聯盟 (AFL) 球員 Nicky Winmar 位於珀斯體育場的青銅雕像移除。
Main Body
The removal was caused by a court decision in Bendigo, where a magistrate found Mr. Winmar guilty of three counts of assault. These convictions relate to an incident in May 2025 in Cohuna, Victoria, involving a female victim. Although the defendant claimed that the woman had lied and that he had been hit in the face, the magistrate decided that the witness was believable. Specifically, he was convicted of pulling the victim by her hair and hitting her head against a door.
此次移除是由於本迪戈法院的一項決定,該地法官裁定 Winmar 先生三項傷害罪名成立。這些定罪與 2025 年 5 月在維多利亞州 Cohuna 發生的一起涉及一名女性受害者的事件有關。儘管被告聲稱該名女性撒謊且其面部遭到擊打,但法官認定證人的證詞可信。具體而言,他被裁定扯住受害者的頭髮並將其頭部撞向門板。
The statue was originally installed in July 2019 to remember Mr. Winmar's 1993 protest against racism during a game against Collingwood. In the past, the government described this event as a key reason for creating anti-racism rules in the sport. However, Premier Roger Cook and his current leadership team decided that the statue could no longer stay. Premier Cook emphasized that removing the monument was necessary to show that society rejects violence against women.
該雕像最初於 2019 年 7 月安裝,旨在紀念 Winmar 先生 1993 年在與 Collingwood 隊比賽期間針對種族主義的抗議行動。過去,政府將此事件描述為該項運動制定反種族主義規則的關鍵原因。然而,州長 Roger Cook 及其現任領導團隊決定該雕像不能再保留。Cook 州長強調,移除此紀念碑是必要的,以表明社會拒絕對女性施加暴力。
On Sunday morning, a team of about six people used a crane to take down the sculpture. VenuesWest, the organization that manages the stadium, confirmed that the statue is now in secure storage while they decide what to do with it. Notably, the removal took place at the start of NAIDOC Week.
週日上午,一支約六人的團隊使用起重機將雕像拆除。管理該體育場的組織 VenuesWest 確認,雕像目前存放於安全儲藏室,而他們則決定如何處理。值得注意的是,移除行動是在 NAIDOC 週開始時進行的。
Conclusion
The statue has been moved to storage after the state government decided that the subject's criminal convictions made the monument inappropriate for public display.
由於州政府決定當事人的刑事定罪使該紀念碑不適合公開展示,雕像已被移至儲藏室。
Vocabulary Learning
🚀 THE 'B2 LEAP': FROM BASIC TO FORMAL
An A2 student says: "The government took the statue away because he did bad things."
A B2 student says: "The government arranged for the removal of the statue due to his criminal convictions."
See the difference? To reach B2, you must stop using 'simple' verbs (do, take, get) and start using Nominalization (turning actions into nouns).
🔍 Analysis: Turning Verbs into 'Weighty' Nouns
Look at how the article transforms simple actions into formal concepts:
- Action: To remove B2 Noun: The removal
- Action: To convict B2 Noun: Convictions
- Action: To protest B2 Noun: Protest
Why do this? In professional English, using the noun form makes you sound objective and authoritative. Instead of focusing on who did it, you focus on the event itself.
🛠️ The 'B2 Tool Kit' from the Text
If you want to upgrade your speaking, swap these A2 patterns for the B2 patterns found in the text:
| A2 Level (Basic) | B2 Level (Advanced) | Context from Article |
|---|---|---|
| He was found guilty | Criminal convictions | "...subject's criminal convictions" |
| They put it there | Originally installed | "The statue was originally installed" |
| It is important | A key reason | "...a key reason for creating rules" |
| He said | Emphasized | "Premier Cook emphasized that..." |
💡 Pro Tip: The 'Passive' Bridge
Notice the sentence: "The statue was originally installed..."
At A2, you only use the active voice ("They installed the statue"). At B2, you use the Passive Voice to shift the focus to the object. When the object (the statue) is more important than the people who moved it, use:
[Object] + [be] + [Past Participle].