Recent rulings from the U.S. Supreme Court and other federal and state courts have significantly increased the President's power over immigration enforcement. At the same time, these courts have set specific limits to prevent the government from overstepping its legal authority.

美國最高法院及其他聯邦與州法院的近期裁決，顯著增加了總統在移民執法方面的權力。同時，這些法院也設定了特定限制，以防止政府逾越其法律權限。

The Supreme Court's recent decisions have helped expand presidential power. The court confirmed that the executive branch can end Temporary Protected Status (TPS) for certain nationalities, limit asylum applications, and deport people to third-party countries. Furthermore, the President now has more power to remove the leaders of independent agencies, although the Federal Reserve remains a special case. Legal experts, such as Elie Honig, emphasize that the conservative majority of the court is not always in agreement. For example, some judges have protected birthright citizenship and limited the government's power to impose tariffs.

最高法院近期的裁決有助於擴展總統權力。法院確認行政部門可以終止某些國籍人士的臨時保護狀態 (TPS)、限制庇護申請，以及將人員驅逐至第三方國家。此外，總統現在擁有更多權力來撤換獨立機構的領導人，儘管聯準會仍是一個特例。法律專家（如 Elie Honig）強調，法院中的保守派多數並不總是達成共識。例如，部分法官保護了出生公民權，並限制了政府徵收關稅的權力。

Meanwhile, lower federal courts have stepped in to stop the government from freezing immigration benefits. In Ohio, Judge Algenon L. Marbley ordered the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) to start processing applications for foreign nationals already living in the U.S. He rejected the administration's argument that national security should completely block judicial review. Similar decisions in Rhode Island show that courts are becoming more skeptical when the government stops processing benefits based on a person's country of origin.

與此同時，較低級的聯邦法院已介入，阻止政府凍結移民福利。在俄亥俄州，法官 Algenon L. Marbley 命令美國公民及移民服務局 (USCIS) 開始處理已居住在美國的外國國民申請。他駁回了政府關於國家安全應完全阻隔司法審查的論點。羅德島州的類似裁決顯示，當政府根據申請人的原產國而停止處理福利時，法院正變得更加質疑。

Additionally, the administration has introduced strict vetting processes that affect even those with strong legal ties, such as spouses of U.S. citizens. Reports show that more people are facing intense interviews, which has discouraged many from filing legal documents. At the state level, legal battles continue; for instance, the Wisconsin Supreme Court has paused a case regarding the legality of ICE detainers while waiting for a decision from a higher appeals court.

此外，政府引入了嚴格的審查程序，甚至影響到具有強大法律聯繫的人員，例如美國公民的配偶。報告顯示更多人面臨激烈的面試，這導致許多人不敢提交法律文件。在州政府層面，法律爭端仍在繼續；例如，威斯康星州最高法院暫停了一起關於 ICE 拘留合法性的案件，以等待更高層上訴法院的裁決。

In summary, the current situation shows a major increase in executive power over immigration, though this is occasionally balanced by court rulings and ongoing lawsuits regarding residency applications.

總結來說，目前情況顯示行政部門對移民的權力大幅增加，儘管這偶爾會被法院裁決以及關於居留申請的持續訴訟所平衡。