The High Court has dismissed a large privacy lawsuit filed by Prince Harry and six other public figures against Associated Newspapers Limited (ANL). This legal decision happened at the same time as the Duke of Sussex's visit to the UK for the Invictus Games.

高等法院駁回了哈利王子與另外六位公眾人物對關聯新聞有限公司 (ANL) 提起的大型隱私訴訟。這項法律決定是在薩塞克斯公爵為傷殘運動會訪問英國期間做出的。

The court case ended when Mr. Justice Nicklin ruled that the claimants did not provide enough evidence to prove that information was gathered illegally. The lawsuit claimed that ANL, which publishes the Daily Mail and Mail on Sunday, used illegal methods such as hacking voicemails to write articles between 1993 and 2018. However, the judge emphasized that the fact that the information was private did not prove it was obtained illegally. Consequently, the dismissal of all 97 claims is a major legal defeat for Prince Harry, who may now have to pay legal costs of around £50 million.

當法官 Nicklin 裁定原告未能提供足夠證據證明資訊是非法獲取時，此案隨之結束。訴訟指稱出版《每日郵報》與《星期日郵報》的 ANL 在 1993 年至 2018 年間，使用了截取語音郵件等非法手段來撰寫文章。然而，法官強調，資訊屬於隱私並不證明其獲取過程是非法的。因此，所有 97 項指控均被駁回，這對哈利王子而言是一次重大的法律挫敗，他現在可能必須支付約 5,000 萬英鎊的法律費用。

At the same time, the Duke's visit to London has been marked by arguments over logistics and security. For example, there was a dispute regarding his stay at Buckingham Palace; his team claimed an offer was withdrawn, whereas palace officials asserted that the invitation expired because he did not respond in time. Furthermore, the Duchess of Sussex and their children did not join the trip because the government refused to provide taxpayer-funded security, meaning the family had to arrange their own private protection.

與此同時，公爵訪問倫敦期間，後勤與安保安排引起了爭執。例如，關於他在白金漢宮入住的問題便有分歧；其團隊聲稱邀請被撤回，而宮廷官員則堅稱是因為他未及時回覆，導致邀請已失效。此外，由於政府拒絕提供由納稅人資助的安保，薩塞克斯公爵夫人及其子女未參與此次行程，這意味著該家庭必須自行安排私人保護。

From an official perspective, the relationship between the Duke and the monarchy remains difficult. Royal experts suggest that any reconciliation between King Charles III and his son is limited by a lack of trust. Because of this, the palace has introduced strict rules to ensure that private conversations do not become public. This shows that the monarchy is now treating the situation as a formal institutional risk rather than a simple family disagreement.

從官方角度來看，公爵與君主制之間的關係依然緊張。王室專家認為，查理三世國王與其子之間的任何和解都受限於缺乏信任。因此，宮廷制定了嚴格的規則，以確保私人對話不會公開。這顯示出王室目前將此情況視為一種正式的體制風險，而非單純的家庭矛盾。

Prince Harry has faced a complete legal defeat in his final major press case, while his return to the UK continues to be overshadowed by security disputes and a strictly managed relationship with the King.

哈利王子在最後一起重大新聞訴訟中遭遇全面潰敗，而他返回英國的行程則繼續被安保爭議以及與國王之間被嚴格管控的關係所籠罩。