The United States federal government has increased its efforts to control voter eligibility and election oversight. This is mainly happening through the promotion of the SAVE America Act and the use of Department of Justice (DOJ) monitors in specific cities.

美國聯邦政府加強了控制選民資格與選舉監督的力度。這主要透過推動《拯救美國法案》以及在特定城市部署司法部 (DOJ) 監察員來實現。

The government's plan for election reform focuses on the SAVE America Act, which would require people to show official documents to prove their citizenship when registering to vote. President Trump has used this goal as a bargaining chip, stating that he will only sign other bipartisan laws if this act is passed. However, critics and some Republican officials argue that requiring documents instead of a simple statement creates an unfair burden for eligible voters who do not have passports or birth certificates. Furthermore, they believe this move ignores the independence of state governments.

政府的選舉改革計劃集中於《拯救美國法案》，該法案將要求民眾在登記投票時，必須出示官方文件以證明其公民身份。川普總統將此目標作為籌碼，表示除非該法案通過，否則他不會簽署其他跨黨派法律。然而，批評者與部分共和黨官員認為，要求出示文件而非簡單聲明，對於沒有護照或出生證明之合資格選民而言，造成了不公平的負擔。此外，他們認為此舉無視了州政府的獨立性。

At the same time, the executive branch is using administrative pressure to remove non-citizens from voter lists. The DOJ's Civil Rights Division warned all 50 states that election officials could face criminal charges if they knowingly allow non-citizens to stay on registration lists. Additionally, FEMA may withhold 20% of anti-terrorism funding from areas that do not verify the citizenship of voters and election workers. The administration also wants to turn the SAVE database into a central tool for checking citizenship, although courts disagree on whether this violates privacy rights.

與此同時，行政部門正利用行政壓力將非公民從選民名單中剔除。司法部民權局警告全美 50 個州，若選舉官員在明知非公民留在登記名單上的情況下仍不處理，可能面臨刑事指控。此外，若某些地區未核實選民與選舉工作人員的公民身份，FEMA 可能會扣除其 20% 的反恐資金。政府亦希望將 SAVE 數據庫轉化為核實公民身份的核心工具，儘管法院對於這是否侵犯隱私權仍持有不同意見。

There is also growing tension over the use of federal monitors. The DOJ placed monitors in Detroit, Lansing, and East Lansing for the August 4 primary, claiming there were problems with ballots in 2024. Local officials have challenged these claims, asserting that the federal government's information is incorrect and interferes with state power. Meanwhile, the Supreme Court has limited the Voting Rights Act, making it harder to use race-conscious maps to fix past discrimination. Finally, the health of Senator Mitch McConnell has raised questions about the lack of a formal process to check if members of Congress are physically or mentally fit to serve, unlike the 25th Amendment which exists for the President.

關於使用聯邦監察員的問題，緊張局勢亦不斷升級。司法部在 8 月 4 日的初選中，於底特律、蘭辛與東蘭辛部署了監察員，聲稱 2024 年的選票出現問題。當地官員對此說法提出質疑，認定聯邦政府的資訊不正確且干預了州權。與此同時，最高法院限制了《投票權法》，使得利用考慮種族之分區圖來修正過往歧視變得更加困難。最後，參議員 Mitch McConnell 的健康狀況引發質疑，認為國會缺乏一套正式程序來檢查議員在生理或心理上是否適任，而總統則已有第 25 條修正案。

The current situation is defined by a conflict between federal demands for citizenship proof and state-led election management. This is made worse by judicial disagreements and the lack of clear rules regarding the health and capacity of elected officials.

目前的局面定義為聯邦政府要求公民證明與州政府主導之選舉管理之間的衝突。司法分歧以及缺乏關於民選官員健康與適任性的明確規則，使情況進一步惡化。