This report examines the deaths of several Iranian citizens during the civil unrest on January 8–9. It focuses on the differences between the official government stories and the testimonies provided by the families.

本報告研究一月 8 至 9 日民事動亂期間，數名伊朗公民死亡的情況。重點在於分析政府官方說法與家屬提供之證詞之間的差異。

The events of January 8–9 happened during a period of economic instability and widespread opposition to the Islamic Republic, which began on December 28. While the Iranian government claimed there were approximately 3,000 deaths, opposition sources suggest a much higher number, between 35,000 and 40,000. Furthermore, these figures are complicated by reports of government-ordered internet shutdowns and mass arrests.

一月 8 至 9 日的事件發生在經濟不穩定且對伊斯蘭共和國有廣泛反對聲浪的時期，此情況始於 12 月 28 日。雖然伊朗政府聲稱約有 3,000 人死亡，但反對派消息來源指出人數高得多，介於 35,000 至 40,000 人之間。此外，政府下令斷網與大規模逮捕，使得這些數字更加複雜。

Specific cases show a pattern of lethal force and government pressure. For example, 18-year-old Taha Naderi was reportedly shot near an IRGC facility in Shahreza and died on January 10 despite several surgeries. Similarly, Rasoul Ziaei, 26, was allegedly shot in Fooladshahr on January 8, and Adel Matlabnejad, 38, was killed on January 9 in Ahvaz. In each case, the process of recovering the bodies was hidden by the authorities.

特定案例顯示出致命武力與政府壓力的模式。例如，18 歲的 Taha Naderi 据報在 Shahreza 的一個 IRGC 設施附近被槍擊，儘管經過多次手術，仍於 1 月 10 日去世。同樣地，26 歲的 Rasoul Ziaei 據稱於 1 月 8 日在 Fooladshahr 被槍擊，而 38 歲的 Adel Matlabnejad 則於 1 月 9 日在 Ahvaz 被殺害。在每個案例中，當局都掩蓋了回收屍體的過程。

State authorities have clearly tried to control the narrative surrounding these deaths. Taha Naderi's family asserted that medical records were changed to claim his gunshot wounds were actually caused by street fighting and a knife. Moreover, the families of Naderi and Matlabnejad were forced to sign legal agreements to limit funeral attendance and stop public mourning. In the case of Rasoul Ziaei, his family claimed that intelligence services had damaged the body by removing organs and an eye. Consequently, these actions suggest a strategy to use psychological pressure to prevent the public from honoring the victims.

國家當局顯然試圖控制圍繞這些死亡事件的敘事。Taha Naderi 的家人堅稱醫療記錄被更改，將其槍傷聲稱為街頭鬥爭與刀傷造成。此外，Naderi 與 Matlabnejad 的家人被強迫簽署法律協議，以限制葬禮出席人數並停止公開哀悼。在 Rasoul Ziaei 的案例中，其家人聲稱情報部門移除了器官與眼球，損毀了屍體。因此，這些行動表明其採取一種心理壓力策略，以防止公眾悼念受害者。

The current situation is defined by a total lack of legal accountability and ongoing fear among families regarding the safety of their loved ones' burial sites.

目前的情況在於完全缺乏法律追責，且家屬對其親人埋葬地點的安全性持續感到恐懼。