Lawsuit Over Alleged Evidence Misconduct by OpenAI in Copyright Case
OpenAI 涉嫌在版權案件中操縱證據而面臨訴訟
Introduction
Several US media companies, including The New York Times and the New York Daily News, have asked a federal court in Manhattan to punish OpenAI. This request follows claims that the company hid evidence and gave false information during the legal process.
包括《紐約時報》與《紐約日報》在內的幾家美國媒體公司，已要求曼哈頓聯邦法院懲罰 OpenAI。此請求是基於該公司在法律程序中隱瞞證據並提供錯誤資訊的指控。
Main Body
The legal battle began with a 2023 lawsuit claiming that OpenAI and Microsoft used copyrighted news articles to train AI models without permission. The current issue is that the media companies believe OpenAI lied about its ability to search through training data and user chat logs. Although OpenAI previously claimed these searches were technically impossible and would violate user privacy, a statement from an engineer suggests that the company had actually checked for copyrighted material before the lawsuit started.
這場法律戰始於 2023 年的一項訴訟，指控 OpenAI 與微軟在未經許可的情況下，使用受版權保護的新聞文章來訓練 AI 模型。目前的爭議在於，媒體公司認為 OpenAI 在是否能搜尋訓練數據和使用者聊天記錄的能力上撒謊。儘管 OpenAI 先前聲稱這些搜尋在技術上是不可能的，且會違反使用者隱私，但一名工程師的聲明顯示，該公司在訴訟開始前實際上已檢查過版權材料。
Furthermore, the plaintiffs claim that OpenAI used a secret system called 'Project Giraffe' to monitor if the AI was repeating copyrighted text. They also argue that OpenAI deleted billions of records and provided 20 million chat logs that were useless because too much information had been removed. Consequently, the media companies are asking the court to reject these logs as evidence and assume that the missing data would have proven that OpenAI copied their content.
此外，原告指控 OpenAI 使用了一個名為「長頸鹿計畫」(Project Giraffe) 的秘密系統，用以監控 AI 是否重複受版權保護的文本。他們還主張 OpenAI 刪除了數十億條記錄，並提供了 2,000 萬份毫無用處的聊天記錄，因為過多資訊已被刪除。因此，媒體公司要求法院拒絕將這些記錄作為證據，並推定缺失的數據將能證明 OpenAI 抄襲了他們的內容。
This case is part of a larger trend where AI-generated summaries are reducing web traffic and ad revenue for traditional news. While some news outlets have signed deals to let AI companies use their work, others are fighting in court. OpenAI has denied these accusations, asserting that the media companies are simply trying to invade user privacy because their copyright claims are becoming weaker.
本案是更大趨勢的一部分，即 AI 生成的摘要正在減少傳統新聞的網頁流量與廣告收入。雖然部分新聞機構已簽署協議允許 AI 公司使用其作品，但其他機構則選擇在法庭上對抗。OpenAI 否認了這些指控，堅稱媒體公司僅僅是試圖侵犯使用者隱私，因為他們的版權主張正變得越來越乏力。
Conclusion
The court must now decide if OpenAI behaved dishonestly during the discovery process and if the requested penalties are necessary.
法院現在必須決定 OpenAI 在證據披露過程中是否表現不誠實，以及所請求的處罰是否必要。
Vocabulary Learning
⚡ The Power of "Connectors" (A2 → B2 Jump)
At an A2 level, you likely use simple words like and, but, or because. To reach B2, you need to use Logical Transitions. These are words that act like road signs, telling the reader exactly how the next idea relates to the previous one.
🔍 Analysis from the Text
Look at these three specific words used in the article. They change the entire "feel" of the writing from a simple story to a professional argument:
-
Furthermore Used to add a second, stronger point.
- A2 style: "They also said OpenAI used a secret system."
- B2 style: "Furthermore, the plaintiffs claim that OpenAI used a secret system..."
-
Consequently Used to show a direct result (Cause Effect).
- A2 style: "So, the media companies want the court to reject logs."
- B2 style: "Consequently, the media companies are asking the court to reject these logs..."
-
While Used to compare two opposite situations in one sentence.
- A2 style: "Some outlets signed deals. Other outlets are fighting."
- B2 style: "While some news outlets have signed deals... others are fighting in court."
🛠️ Practical Application Guide
| Instead of... (A2) | Try this... (B2) | Why? |
|---|---|---|
| And / Also | Furthermore / Moreover | It sounds more academic and persuasive. |
| So | Consequently / Therefore | It proves a logical link between two facts. |
| But | While / Whereas | It allows you to balance two ideas together. |
Pro Tip: Don't just use these at the start of a sentence. Try placing them after the subject for a more sophisticated flow: "The companies, consequently, asked the court for a penalty."