The United States Supreme Court has cancelled an executive order that tried to limit birthright citizenship, leading the administration to ask for a new hearing.

美國最高法院撤銷了一項試圖限制出生公民權的行政命令，導致行政部門要求重新聆訊。

In the case of Trump v. Barbara, the Supreme Court ruled 6-3 that the 14th Amendment guarantees automatic citizenship to almost everyone born in the U.S. This includes children of parents who are in the country illegally or temporarily. Chief Justice John Roberts emphasized that this constitutional promise ensures the right to participate in politics. Consequently, this decision stopped an executive order from January 20, 2025, which aimed to deny citizenship to these children.

在「川普對芭芭拉」一案中，最高法院以 6 比 3 的票數裁定，第 14 條修正案保障幾乎所有在美國出生的人自動獲得公民權。這包括父母在美國非法或暫時居留的子女。首席大法官約翰·羅伯茨強調，這項憲法承諾確保了參與政治的權利。因此，這項決定阻止了 2025 年 1 月 20 日生效的一項行政命令，該命令旨在拒絕賦予這些兒童公民權。

During the ruling, Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson shared an additional opinion that challenged traditional legal interpretations. She argued that some judges ignore the important role Black Americans played in creating the 14th Amendment. By looking at a wider historical view, Jackson asserted that the amendment's universal goals were a result of the efforts of Black citizens. Therefore, she criticized the use of limited historical records to support restrictive laws.

在裁決過程中，大法官凱坦吉·布朗·傑克森分享了一份附加意見，挑戰了傳統的法律解釋。她認為某些法官忽略了非裔美國人在制定第 14 條修正案時扮演的重要角色。傑克森主張，從更廣泛的歷史視角來看，該修正案的普世目標是非裔公民努力的結果。因此，她批評利用有限的歷史記錄來支持限制性法律的做法。

On the other hand, the executive branch described the ruling as a failure of justice. President Donald Trump announced plans to request a rehearing, citing the problem of 'birth tourism.' This claim is based on reports of a Texas hospital advertising maternity packages in Mexico. Although the hospital removed the ads, Secretary Markwayne Mullin maintains that these practices risk national security. However, legal experts believe a new hearing is unlikely, and any changes through Congress would face major political obstacles.

另一方面，行政部門將該裁決描述為司法失敗。川普總統宣布計劃要求重新聆訊，理由是存在「生育觀光」問題。這一主張基於有報告指出德州一家醫院在墨西哥廣告推廣分娩套裝。雖然該醫院已撤下廣告，但部長馬克韋恩·馬林堅持認為這些做法會威脅國家安全。然而，法律專家認為重新聆訊的可能性不高，且任何透過國會做出的改變都將面臨重大的政治障礙。

The Supreme Court has protected birthright citizenship, although the administration continues to fight the decision through legal requests and political inquiries.

最高法院保障了出生公民權，儘管行政部門繼續透過法律請求和政治調查來對抗這項決定。