The 36th NATO summit in Ankara ended with a six-point agreement. Notably, the document did not explicitly name China as a rival, although it highlighted ongoing internal discussions regarding defense spending and future strategy.

在安卡拉舉行的第 36 屆北約峰會以一份六點協議結束。值得注意的是，該文件未明確將中國列為對手，儘管文中強調了關於國防開支與未來策略的內部討論仍在進行中。

The summit was marked by continued tension between the United States and its European allies over how to share defense costs. In the past, President Trump used threats of leaving the alliance and demanded that allies increase their spending—specifically suggesting a 5% target—to put pressure on them. However, experts believe these tactics are now less effective. This is because European countries are becoming more independent in their military actions due to Russian aggression and a belief that the U.S. cannot solve every problem alone, especially regarding Iran. Consequently, the alliance is moving toward a fairer distribution of responsibility.

此次峰會的特點是美國與歐洲盟友之間，對於如何分擔國防開支仍充滿緊張氣氛。過去，川普總統曾以威脅退出聯盟，並要求盟友增加開支——特別是建議將目標設為 5%——來對其施壓。然而，專家認為這些策略現在已較不有效。這是因為受到俄羅斯侵略的影響，加上認為美國無法單獨解決所有問題（尤其是關於伊朗的部分），歐洲國家在軍事行動上正變得更加獨立。因此，該聯盟正趨向於更公平的責任分擔。

At the same time, NATO is expanding its focus toward the Indo-Pacific region. This is shown by Secretary-General Mark Rutte's meetings with the 'IP4' partners: Australia, Japan, New Zealand, and South Korea. Beijing views this move as a mistake and an attempt to bring 'bloc politics' into a region that is mostly focused on economic cooperation. Furthermore, the Chinese government has denied that its military growth is a threat to security in Europe and North America. Instead, China has called for a more stable relationship based on mutual respect, similar to recent talks between President Xi Jinping and President Trump.

與此同時，北約正將焦點擴展至印太地區。秘書長 Mark Rutte 與「IP4」夥伴（澳洲、日本、紐西蘭及南韓）的會面便證明了這一點。北京將此舉視為錯誤，認為是企圖將「陣營政治」引入一個主要關注經濟合作的地區。此外，中國政府否認其軍事增長會對歐洲與北美的安全構成威脅。相反，中國呼籲建立一個基於相互尊重的穩定關係，類似於近期習近平主席與川普總統之間的會談。

From a broader perspective, the competition is changing. It is no longer just about how much money is spent on defense, but about who controls the best industrial systems. The ability to innovate technologically, manage secure supply chains, and acquire strategic resources are now seen as the most important factors of military power. This suggests that a country's industrial strength is now more important than its total defense budget.

從更廣泛的角度來看，競爭模式正在改變。這不再僅僅是關於國防開支的多少，而是關於誰掌控最優質的工業系統。技術創新能力、管理安全供應鏈以及獲取戰略資源，現在被視為軍事力量最重要的因素。這顯示出一個國家的工業實力現在比其總國防預算更為重要。

The Ankara summit shows that NATO is in a period of change, trying to balance its internal relationships in the Atlantic while expanding its strategic interests in the Indo-Pacific.

安卡拉峰會顯示北約正處於一個轉型期，嘗試在平衡大西洋內部關係的同時，擴展其在印太地區的戰略利益。