New Laws on Character Evidence in New South Wales Sentencing
Introduction
The New South Wales government has introduced new laws that stop the use of good character references to reduce the sentences of people convicted of sexual offences.
Main Body
The process of passing this law showed a clear disagreement between the Labor government and the upper house. Premier Chris Minns and Attorney-General Michael Daley originally wanted to remove character evidence for all types of crimes. However, because the government did not have a majority in the upper house, they had to reach an agreement with the Coalition and the Greens. Consequently, the law now only applies to sexual offences. Different groups held strong views on this issue. The #YourReferenceAintRelevant campaign, led by survivors Harrison James and Jarad Grice, argued for a total ban to stop offenders from appearing as 'good people' during court. On the other hand, legal organizations such as Legal Aid NSW and the NSW Bar Association expressed concerns. They emphasized that character evidence is important for rehabilitation. Furthermore, Domestic Violence NSW warned that removing this evidence could unfairly harm vulnerable people in domestic conflict cases. Because the final law was more limited than they wanted, the government has introduced the original, broader plan as a new bill. Attorney-General Daley asserted that this move is necessary to put political pressure on the Coalition and the Greens, whom he accused of ignoring the needs of victims.
Conclusion
Although character references are now banned for sexual offences, the government is still trying to achieve a total ban for all criminal sentencing.
Learning
The 'Connective Leap'
At an A2 level, you likely use and, but, and because. To move toward B2, you must replace these with Logical Connectors. These words act like road signs, telling the reader exactly how two ideas relate.
⚡ The 'Logic Shift' Analysis
Look at how this article connects complex ideas. Instead of simple words, it uses Advanced Transitions:
-
Contrast (The "Opposite" Sign):
- A2 Style: "They wanted a total ban, but others disagreed."
- B2 Style (from text): "On the other hand, legal organizations... expressed concerns."
- B2 Style (from text): "Although character references are now banned..."
-
Result (The "Effect" Sign):
- A2 Style: "They didn't have a majority, so they changed the law."
- B2 Style (from text): "Consequently, the law now only applies to sexual offences."
-
Addition (The "More Info" Sign):
- A2 Style: "They said it's important and they warned about victims."
- B2 Style (from text): "Furthermore, Domestic Violence NSW warned..."
🛠️ Application Strategy
To sound more fluent, stop using so to start a sentence. Try this replacement map:
| If you want to say... | Use this B2 word | Example from the Text |
|---|---|---|
| "And also..." | Furthermore | "Furthermore, Domestic Violence NSW warned..." |
| "So / Therefore..." | Consequently | "Consequently, the law now only applies..." |
| "But..." | On the other hand | "On the other hand, legal organizations..." |
Pro Tip: Notice that Consequently and Furthermore are followed by a comma (,). This is a key punctuation habit for B2 academic writing.