Israel Expands Death Penalty Laws and Changes Territorial Policies
Introduction
The Israeli parliament has passed a new law that allows the death penalty for Palestinian residents of Gaza and the West Bank. This change happens as Israel also works to remove previous peace agreements.
Main Body
The Knesset voted 93-0 to create special courts to judge 'crimes against humanity' related to the events of October 7, 2023. These trials will be broadcast on television, following a legal pattern used during the 1962 trial of Adolf Eichmann. This law adds to previous rules that allow the execution of Palestinians for nationalist murder, although Jewish citizens are not subject to these penalties. Currently, about 1,000 Gazans are held as 'unlawful combatants,' and many West Bank residents are tried in military courts where conviction rates are reportedly over 90 percent. Furthermore, new laws are being developed to prevent the creation of a Palestinian state. For example, a member of the Jewish Power Party has proposed canceling the 1993 Oslo Accords. These efforts are part of a larger plan to register West Bank lands as exclusively Israeli. This expansion is clear from the number of settlers in the West Bank, which has grown from 110,000 in 1993 to about 530,000 today, with another 200,000 in East Jerusalem. Consequently, the international community has responded with criticism and sanctions. The United Kingdom and other European allies have described the death penalty laws as discriminatory. Meanwhile, the European Union has imposed sanctions on Israeli individuals and groups involved in illegal settlements. In response, Palestinian officials have called for non-violent resistance and more international pressure to end the occupation.
Conclusion
Israel has now created a legal system that applies the death penalty based on ethnicity and is moving toward the formal end of the Oslo Accords.
Learning
⚡ The 'B2 Jump': From Simple Lists to Logical Flow
At an A2 level, you likely use words like and, but, and because. To reach B2, you must stop listing facts and start connecting ideas.
Look at these three power-words from the text that act as 'bridges' for your thoughts:
-
Furthermore Use this instead of 'And also'.
- Example: "The law allows the death penalty. Furthermore, it prevents the creation of a state."
- B2 Logic: It tells the reader, "I have more important information to add to my previous point."
-
Consequently Use this instead of 'So'.
- Example: "The laws are discriminatory. Consequently, the international community has responded with criticism."
- B2 Logic: It creates a direct cause-and-effect link. Action A leads to Result B.
-
Meanwhile Use this to switch focus without losing the thread.
- Example: "The UK described the laws as discriminatory. Meanwhile, the EU imposed sanctions."
- B2 Logic: It shows two different things happening at the same time in the same context.
🛠️ Vocabulary Shift: Precision over Simplicity
To sound like a B2 speaker, replace generic A2 verbs with 'Precise Verbs'. Notice how the article avoids using "do" or "get":
| A2 Word (Basic) | B2 Word (Precise) | Context in Text |
|---|---|---|
| Give/Set | Impose | "...imposed sanctions..." |
| Change | Expand | "Israel expands death penalty laws..." |
| Say/Ask | Describe | "...described the laws as discriminatory." |
Pro Tip: Next time you want to say "The government gave a new rule," try "The government imposed a new regulation."