Court Rules That Mondelēz Misled Consumers by Reducing Product Size
Introduction
A regional court in Germany has ruled that the chocolate manufacturer Mondelēz deceived customers by reducing the weight of Milka chocolate bars while keeping the packaging looking the same.
Main Body
The legal action was started by the Hamburg consumer protection office. They claimed that reducing the Milka Alpine Milk bar from 100g to 90g, while increasing the price from €1.49 to €1.99, was a deceptive practice. This trend is known as 'shrinkflation,' which happens when a company reduces the amount of a product but keeps the price the same or increases it. The court decided that keeping the famous purple packaging without clearly stating the weight change was not transparent enough for consumers. Mondelēz argued that these changes were caused by external economic pressures, especially the rising cost of raw materials. The company pointed to poor harvests in Côte d’Ivoire and Ghana, which produce more than 50% of the world's cocoa, as well as higher energy and transport costs. Although the company asserted that they shared this information on social media and digital platforms, the court concluded that a physical notice on the packaging for at least four months was necessary to prevent customer confusion. This is not the first time the company has used such strategies. For example, Mondelēz changed the shape of Toblerone bars in 2016 to reduce their volume, though they reversed this decision in 2018. Furthermore, evidence shows a wider trend in the confectionery industry where brands like Quality Street and Celebrations have also reduced their sizes to deal with the unstable cocoa supply.
Conclusion
The court has ordered the company to provide a clear notification period, although Mondelēz has thirty days to file an appeal.
Learning
⚡ The "B2 Leap": Mastering Causality
To move from A2 (simple sentences) to B2 (complex arguments), you must stop using because for everything. In this text, we see how professional English explains why things happen using more sophisticated structures.
🛠️ From Basic to Advanced
A2 Style (Simple): "The cost of materials went up, so the company reduced the chocolate size."
B2 Style (Analytical): "These changes were caused by external economic pressures..."
The Secret: Instead of just saying "A happened, so B happened," use Passive Causality. This shifts the focus from the person to the situation, making you sound more objective and academic.
🔍 Linguistic Breakdown
Observe these three ways the article connects causes and effects:
-
The Passive Link: "Changes were caused by..." Formula: [Effect] + [be] + [caused by] + [Reason].
-
The Purpose Connector: "...to prevent customer confusion." Don't just say "so customers don't get confused." Use to + verb to show a professional intention.
-
The Justification Verb: "Mondelēz argued that..." In B2 English, we don't just "say" things. We argue, assert, or claim. This tells the reader that the information is an opinion or a legal defense, not necessarily a fact.
🚀 Quick Upgrade Table
| Instead of (A2) | Try this (B2) | Example from Text |
|---|---|---|
| Because of | Due to / Caused by | "...caused by external economic pressures" |
| Said | Asserted / Claimed | "...the company asserted that..." |
| To stop | To prevent | "...to prevent customer confusion" |