New Minimum Tax Rate for Discretionary Trusts

Introduction

The federal government has announced a new 30 per cent minimum tax on income earned through discretionary trusts, which will start on July 1, 2028.

Main Body

This new tax rule aims to reduce the gap between the tax paid on trust income and the tax paid on regular wages. According to the Treasury, people using these trusts paid about 4 per cent less tax than those with similar incomes who did not use them. The government emphasizes that 90 per cent of private trust wealth is held by the richest 10 per cent of households. Consequently, this change is expected to raise $4.47 billion in the first year, which will be used to fund a $250 tax credit for workers. Under the new system, the trustee will pay the tax before the money is given to the beneficiaries. To avoid paying tax twice, individual beneficiaries can receive non-refundable credits. However, corporate beneficiaries cannot get these credits, which means they could face a very high effective tax rate. It is important to note that some groups, such as charities and special disability trusts, are exempt from this new rule. Many professionals and business groups have expressed concerns about this policy. While the government targets wealthy individuals, accountants suggest that about 350,000 small businesses may be affected because they use trusts to plan for the future. Furthermore, business groups argue that higher taxes could discourage investment and innovation. To help with the change, the government will offer a 'rollover relief' period from 2027 to 2030, allowing taxpayers to move their assets into other structures, such as companies.

Conclusion

The government wants to make wealth distribution fairer through these changes, but the political opposition has promised to remove these rules if they take power.

Learning

🚀 The 'Bridge' Concept: Moving from Simple to Sophisticated Logic

An A2 student says: "The government wants more money, so they made a new tax." A B2 student says: "Consequently, this change is expected to raise $4.47 billion..."

To move to B2, you must stop using only "and," "but," and "so." You need Logical Connectors that show cause, effect, and contrast.


🛠️ The 'Connector' Toolkit from the Text

The WordWhat it doesSimple Version (A2)B2 Upgrade (Example from text)
ConsequentlyShows a direct resultSo"Consequently, this change is expected to raise..."
FurthermoreAdds a strong new pointAlso"Furthermore, business groups argue..."
WhileShows two opposite ideasBut"While the government targets wealthy individuals..."

🧠 Linguistic Shift: The 'Passive' Perspective

B2 English often focuses on the action or the result, not the person. Look at this shift:

  • A2 (Active): "The government will give a credit to workers."
  • B2 (Passive): "...which will be used to fund a $250 tax credit for workers."

Why this matters: Using "will be used" or "is expected to" makes you sound professional and objective. It removes the "I" or "They" and focuses on the fact.

⚠️ The 'Hedge' (Softening your claims)

Notice the phrase: "may be affected."

At A2, students say: "350,000 businesses are affected." (This is a 100% fact). At B2, we use modal verbs (may, might, could) to show that something is a possibility, not a certainty. This is the hallmark of an advanced speaker.

  • "Higher taxes could discourage investment." (Not 'will'—because we aren't 100% sure).

Vocabulary Learning

discretionary (adj.)
Decided or allowed to be chosen freely; not mandatory.
Example:The discretionary trust allows beneficiaries to decide how the income is distributed.
minimum (adj.)
The lowest possible amount or level.
Example:The new tax sets a minimum rate of 30 percent on trust income.
gap (n.)
A difference or space between two things.
Example:The law aims to close the gap between the tax paid on trust income and on regular wages.
regular (adj.)
Consistent, ordinary, or typical.
Example:Tax paid on regular wages is usually lower than on trust income.
wealth (n.)
Abundant resources or money.
Example:Private trust wealth is largely concentrated among the richest households.
richest (adj.)
Having the most wealth.
Example:The richest 10 percent hold most of the private trust wealth.
households (n.)
A group of people living together in a dwelling.
Example:Households with high incomes may use trusts to manage their wealth.
fund (v.)
To provide money for a particular purpose.
Example:The tax revenue will fund a $250 credit for workers.
credit (n.)
An amount of money that can be used to offset a debt.
Example:Workers receive a tax credit of $250 to help with living expenses.
beneficiaries (n.)
People who receive benefits from something.
Example:Beneficiaries receive the trust income after the tax has been paid.
non-refundable (adj.)
Cannot be returned or reimbursed.
Example:Non-refundable credits cannot be claimed by corporate beneficiaries.
corporate (adj.)
Relating to a company or corporation.
Example:Corporate beneficiaries are not eligible for the tax credits.
effective (adj.)
Producing the intended result.
Example:The effective tax rate for corporate beneficiaries could be very high.
concerns (n.)
Worries or issues.
Example:Business groups expressed concerns about the impact of higher taxes.
policy (n.)
A plan or set of principles guiding actions.
Example:The new tax policy targets wealthy individuals.
innovation (n.)
The introduction of new ideas or methods.
Example:Higher taxes could discourage innovation and investment.
rollover (n.)
The act of moving assets into a new structure.
Example:The rollover relief period allows taxpayers to transfer their assets.
relief (n.)
Assistance or reduction of burden.
Example:The relief period helps ease the transition for affected businesses.
assets (n.)
Resources owned by an individual or company.
Example:Taxpayers can move their assets into other structures during the relief period.
structures (n.)
Different types of organizations or arrangements.
Example:Trusts can be replaced with other structures such as companies.
opposition (n.)
Resistance or disagreement with a policy.
Example:Political opposition promised to remove the rules if they take power.