Department of Justice Claims Racial Bias in Yale School of Medicine Admissions
Introduction
The United States Department of Justice (DOJ) has accused the Yale School of Medicine of breaking federal civil rights laws by using race as a factor when choosing which students to admit.
Main Body
The DOJ asserts that Yale University violated Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. After a year-long investigation, the agency claims that the university used a 'holistic' review process to prioritize applicants based on their race. According to the DOJ, this was a way to avoid the 2023 Supreme Court ruling that banned affirmative action in higher education. Furthermore, the agency argues that Yale intentionally ignored judicial orders by continuing to maintain diverse student groups. Data provided by the DOJ shows a clear difference in admission requirements. For the 2023 to 2025 classes, Black and Hispanic applicants were admitted with lower average GPAs and test scores than white and Asian students. For example, in the most recent class, Black students had a median GPA of 3.88, while Asian and white students had medians of 3.98 and 3.97. Consequently, the DOJ suggests that a Black applicant was up to 29 times more likely to get an interview than an Asian applicant with the same academic records. This action is part of a larger government plan to remove Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) programs from universities. The DOJ emphasized that prioritizing race over academic skill in medical school is a public safety risk. Similar warnings have been sent to UCLA, and other top universities like Harvard and Stanford are also facing investigations. However, some academics argue that the government is being too strict and that universities should still be allowed to consider a student's personal growth and character.
Conclusion
The DOJ is currently trying to reach a voluntary agreement with Yale University, but it may start legal action if the university does not follow federal law.
Learning
đ The 'Connector' Secret: Moving from Simple to Sophisticated
At an A2 level, you likely use and, but, and because to link your ideas. To reach B2, you need to use Transition Signals. These are words that tell the reader how two ideas are connected (cause, contrast, or addition).
đ The B2 Upgrade Map
Look at how this article avoids simple words and uses "Professional Bridges" instead:
| Instead of... (A2) | Use this... (B2) | Example from Text |
|---|---|---|
| And / Also | Furthermore | "Furthermore, the agency argues..." |
| So | Consequently | "Consequently, the DOJ suggests..." |
| But | However | "However, some academics argue..." |
đ Why this matters
When you use "Consequently," you aren't just saying something happened; you are showing a logical result. When you use "Furthermore," you are building a stronger argument by adding a second, more important point.
đĄ Pro Tip: The Comma Rule
Notice that these B2 words are almost always followed by a comma when they start a sentence:
⥠Quick Vocabulary Shift
To sound more B2, replace basic verbs with "Precise Verbs" found in the text:
- Don't say say Use assert or emphasize.
- Don't say change Use violated (when talking about laws).
- Don't say look at Use investigation.