NIH Senior Adviser Promotes 'Make America Healthy Again' Plan at Diabetes Conference
NIH 高級顧問在糖尿病會議推廣「讓美國再次健康」計劃
Introduction
Richard Woychik, a senior adviser to NIH Director Jay Bhattacharya, gave a keynote speech at the 2026 American Diabetes Association (ADA) scientific sessions. During his talk, he supported the 'Make America Healthy Again' (MAHA) policy framework.
NIH 局長 Jay Bhattacharya 的高級顧問 Richard Woychik 在 2026 年美國糖尿病協會 (ADA) 科學會議上發表主題演講。在演講中，他支持「讓美國再次健康」(MAHA) 的政策框架。
Main Body
Woychik explained that the NIH wants to use the MAHA strategy to fight chronic diseases, such as diabetes, by focusing on prevention and finding the root causes of these illnesses. He emphasized that the current administration is changing NIH priorities to ensure 'gold standard science' and more accurate experiments. According to Woychik, this shift is the main reason why research goals have recently changed.
Woychik 解釋，NIH 希望利用 MAHA 策略來對抗糖尿病等慢性病，重點在於預防並找出這些疾病的根源。他強調現任政府正改變 NIH 的優先事項，以確保「金標準科學」和更準確的實驗。根據 Woychik 的說法，這一轉變是近期研究目標改變的主要原因。
However, many experts disagreed with this approach. Rita Kalyani, the ADA's chief scientific officer, expressed concerns that these changes could damage biomedical research institutions and destroy established programs. Furthermore, critics argued that new rules for the peer-review process might stop scientific discovery. Woychik responded by stating that funding cuts were caused by Congress and the usual instability of government changes, suggesting that people use the public comment period to voice their concerns.
然而，許多專家不同意這種做法。ADA 的首席科學官 Rita Kalyani 表示擔心，這些改變可能會損害生物醫學研究機構並摧毀既有計劃。此外，批評者認為同行評審程序的新規則可能會阻礙科學發現。Woychik 回應稱，資金削減是由國會以及政府更迭時常見的不穩定所導致，建議民眾利用公眾評論期來表達關注。
Woychik also discussed the 'exposome' and how the environment affects health. He called for more research into how the body responds to vaccines and how fluoride in water affects children's mental health, noting that current studies are often inconsistent. Meanwhile, the ADA reported that security removed five people from the event for handing out articles that criticized the administration's impact on research, claiming they broke the event's rules.
Woychik 還討論了「外顯體」以及環境如何影響健康。他呼籲針對身體對疫苗的反應，以及水中的氟化物如何影響兒童心理健康進行更多研究，並指出目前的研究往往並不一致。同時，ADA 報告指出，安保人員將五人從活動中驅逐，原因是他們分發批評政府對研究影響的文章，聲稱他們違反了活動規則。
Conclusion
The event showed a deep disagreement between the new NIH leadership's goals and the concerns of the scientific community regarding funding and independence.
此次活動顯示了新任 NIH 領導層的目標，與科學界對資金和獨立性的關注之間存在深層分歧。
Vocabulary Learning
⚡ The "Contrast Shift": Moving from A2 to B2
At the A2 level, students usually connect ideas with and, but, or because. To reach B2, you need to use Transition Markers that show the relationship between two opposing ideas more professionally.
🔍 Case Study: The Article's Logic
Look at how the text moves from the government's plan to the experts' fears. It doesn't just say "but"; it uses specific tools:
- "However..." This resets the direction of the conversation. It tells the reader: "Everything I just said is now being challenged."
- "Furthermore..." This is the B2 version of "also." It adds a second, stronger layer of argument to the first one.
- "Meanwhile..." This creates a cinematic effect. It shows two different things happening at the same time (The speech vs. the security removals).
🛠️ The Upgrade Path
Stop using basic connectors and try these "Bridge" alternatives found in the text:
| Instead of (A2) | Use this (B2) | Why? |
|---|---|---|
| But | However | It sounds more objective and academic. |
| Also / And | Furthermore | It suggests the next point is even more important. |
| At the same time | Meanwhile | It manages the timeline of the story better. |
💡 Pro Tip: The "Root Cause" Phrase
The article mentions finding the "root causes." In A2, you might say "the main reason." In B2, using "root cause" shows you can describe the origin of a problem, not just the reason it happened. This is a key shift toward more precise, native-like English.