Former American supermodel Carré Otis has filed a formal complaint in a Parisian court, accusing Gérald Marie of human trafficking and the rape of a minor.

前美國超級名模 Carré Otis 已向巴黎法院提出正式訴訟，指控 Gérald Marie 涉嫌人口販運及強姦未成年人。

The legal case focuses on events that began in 1986, when the Elite Model agency sent Otis, who was seventeen at the time, to Paris. According to the court documents, the defendant provided her with housing in his own home, claiming he wanted to mentor her professionally. However, Ms. Otis alleges that she was repeatedly sexually assaulted and later trafficked to wealthy European men. Furthermore, she asserts that she was never paid for her professional work during this period.

本案聚焦於 1986 年開始的事件，當時 Elite Model 經紀公司將當時 17 歲的 Otis 派遣至巴黎。根據法院文件，被告在其家中為她提供住宿，聲稱希望在專業方面指導她。然而，Otis 女士指稱她多次遭受性侵，隨後被販賣給歐洲富商。此外，她堅稱在這段期間，她的專業工作從未獲得報酬。

Regarding the legal side of the case, French law prevents the direct prosecution of Mr. Marie based on Ms. Otis's testimony alone. This is because the time limit for filing a claim—which lasts until a victim reaches age 48—has already passed. Despite this, her lawyer, Mathias Darmon, emphasized that the current filing is a strategic move. He explained that it serves as a way to allow other potential victims to join the legal proceedings, even if they cannot be prosecuted individually.

在法律方面，法國法律禁止僅根據 Otis 女士的證詞就直接起訴 Marie 先生。這是因為提出索賠的期限（直到受害者滿 48 歲）已經屆滿。儘管如此，她的律師 Mathias Darmon 強調，目前的起訴是一項策略性舉措。他解釋，此舉旨在讓其他潛在受害者能夠加入法律程序，即使他們個人無法被起訴。

In terms of background, Mr. Marie, now 76, ran Elite's European operations from 1985 to 2010, a time when the agency dominated the market. Ms. Otis, who became famous in high-fashion magazines, has described these allegations as a critique of a systemic culture of sexual exploitation in the fashion industry. She compared this situation to the institutional failures seen in the Jeffrey Epstein case.

在背景方面，現年 76 歲的 Marie 先生在 1985 年至 2010 年期間負責 Elite 的歐洲業務，當時該公司主導了市場。在高級時裝雜誌中成名的 Otis 女士將這些指控描述為對時裝業系統性性剝削文化的批判。她將此情況比作 Jeffrey Epstein 案中所見的制度性失敗。

Although the defendant denies the claims and the main complainant cannot be prosecuted due to the time limit, the legal action continues to provide a path for other victims to come forward.

儘管被告否認指控，且主原告因期限問題無法被起訴，但法律行動仍為其他受害者提供了站出來的途徑。