The Allahabad High Court has formally criticized the conduct of the Uttar Pradesh police and government officials, stating that institutional loyalty has shifted from the law toward political interests.

阿拉巴德高等法院正式批評北方邦警察與政府官員的行為，指出制度上的忠誠已從法律轉向政治利益。

The court's comments followed a case filed by Rajendra Tyagi, which led to the cancellation of a trial under the Gangsters Act. The judges noted that the Act was wrongly used in a business dispute, highlighting the arrest of a homemaker without evidence as a clear example of police abuse of power. This case led to a wider review of the state's administration, which the court described as being influenced by an outdated 'feudal mindset' among political and bureaucratic leaders.

法院的評論源於 Rajendra Tyagi 提起的一宗案件，該案導致了一項根據《幫派法》進行的審理被取消。法官指出，該法在商業糾紛中被錯誤使用，而一名家庭主婦在缺乏證據的情況下被逮捕，便是警察濫用權力的明顯例子。此案促使對該州行政管理進行更廣泛的審查，法院將其描述為政治與官僚領導層中受過時的「封建心態」影響。

Furthermore, the court emphasized that the state's administration has been deeply affected by political interference. The judges observed that job postings, transfers, and promotions are based on political connections rather than professional merit. Consequently, officers who support the ruling party receive better assignments, while independent officers are often punished with unfair transfers. This system encourages officers to act in ways that please their political superiors, which the court linked to the occurrence of encounter killings and selective police crackdowns.

此外，法院強調該州的行政管理深受政治干擾影響。法官觀察到，職位指派、調任與晉升是基於政治關係而非專業能力。因此，支持執政黨的警官能獲得較好的職位，而獨立的警官則經常被不公正地調職。這種制度鼓勵警官採取討好政治上司的行為，法院將其與「遭遇戰」殺戮（encounter killings）及選擇性警察打擊聯繫起來。

Finally, the court highlighted a general disregard for the rule of law, noting that legal safeguards are frequently ignored. The bench stated that judicial orders are often followed only on the surface, while the actual intent of the law is defeated. Specific criticism was directed at the Home Secretary's office for serving private interests instead of acting as an impartial authority. The court also mentioned the Bikru village operation as evidence of a lack of accountability, as the supervising officer received very light punishment despite a significant loss of life.

最後，法院指出對法治普遍缺乏尊重，法律保障經常被忽視。法官表示，司法命令往往僅在表面上被執行，而法律的實際意圖則被化解。法院特別批評內政部秘書辦公室服務於私人利益，而非作為公正的權威機構。法院還提到 Bikru 村的行動是缺乏問責制的證據，因為儘管造成嚴重人員傷亡，負責監督的官員僅受到極輕微的懲處。

The Allahabad High Court has called for an independent review of officer suitability and stressed that the state government must be accountable to the Constitution rather than any political party.

阿拉巴德高等法院要求對警官的適任性進行獨立審查，並強調州政府必須對憲法負責，而非對任何政黨負責。