Professor Sir John Curtice has reported a significant drop in public support for Brexit since the 2016 referendum.

約翰·柯提斯教授爵士報告指出，自2016年全民公投以來，公眾對脫歐的支持度大幅下降。

The current political situation shows a clear difference between what people expected from the 2016 referendum and the actual results. According to Professor Sir John Curtice, many people now question whether the referendum was an effective way to make a decision, as a slight majority of voters now believe the UK should rejoin the European Union. This change has happened because the withdrawal failed to meet its main goals, such as returning full control to the nation and increasing the UK's global influence.

目前的政治局勢顯示，人們對2016年公投的預期與實際結果之間存在明顯差異。根據約翰·柯提斯教授爵士的說法，許多人現在質疑公投是否為一種有效的決策方式，因為目前略過半數的選民認為英國應重新加入歐盟。這種改變是因為脫歐未能達成其主要目標，例如將完全控制權交回國家並增加英國的全球影響力。

Furthermore, the link between leaving the EU and economic stability has been viewed negatively. Data suggests that the economic impact has been worse than the 'Leave' supporters expected. Similarly, the goal of reducing immigration was not fully achieved; although migration from EU countries fell, there was a matching increase in migration from non-EU countries. Consequently, many voters blame these negative economic and demographic trends on Brexit, leading to a double-digit increase in support for EU membership within two years of leaving.

此外，脫離歐盟與經濟穩定之間的聯繫被視為負面。數據顯示，經濟影響比「脫歐派」支持者的預期更糟。同樣地，減少移民的目標也未能完全達成；雖然來自歐盟國家的移民減少了，但非歐盟國家的移民則相應增加。因此，許多選民將這些負面的經濟與人口趨勢歸咎於脫歐，導致在脫歐後的兩年內，支持加入歐盟的人數增加了雙位數。

Public opinion has shifted back toward the European Union because the promises regarding the economy and immigration were not kept.

由於關於經濟與移民的承諾未能兌現，公眾輿論已轉向支持重新加入歐盟。