A long labor and hunger strike by detainees at the Delaney Hall facility in Newark, New Jersey, has caused a series of violent clashes between protesters and police.

位於紐澤西州紐華克的德萊尼大廳設施中，被拘留者進行了長期的勞工罷工與絕食，導致抗議者與警方之間發生了一系列暴力衝突。

The current instability at Delaney Hall is based on claims from at least 300 detainees. They assert that the center provides poor quality food, insufficient medical care, and that staff have physically mistreated them. Consequently, they have organized a strike to demand a meeting with Governor Mikie Sherrill, as they want the privately managed 1,000-bed center to be closed completely. Although the Department of Homeland Security has allowed some family visits and released pregnant detainees, the facility remains a center of conflict.

德萊尼大廳目前的不穩定局勢源於至少 300 名被拘留者的指控。他們聲稱該中心提供的食物品質低劣、醫療照顧不足，且工作人員對他們進行肢體虐待。因此，他們組織了罷工，要求與州長 Mikie Sherrill 會面，因為他們希望這個由私人管理、擁有 1,000 個床位的中心能被完全關閉。儘管國土安全部已允許部分家庭探視並釋放了懷孕的被拘留者，但該設施仍是衝突的中心。

Outside the facility, persistent protests have led to an increase in violence. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) and New Jersey State Police have used batons, stun guns, and tear gas against protesters, including journalists, a US senator, and activists like Ian Austin. Furthermore, the recent arrest of Ian Austin and the difficulty in finding his location show a lack of transparency in how the facility communicates. Governor Sherrill defended the use of state police, emphasizing that it was a necessary step to prevent more violence and avoid a larger federal intervention.

設施外的持續抗議導致暴力事件增加。移民及海關執法局 (ICE) 與紐澤西州警使用了警棍、電擊槍和催淚瓦斯對付抗議者，其中包括記者、一名美國參議員以及如 Ian Austin 等活動人士。此外，近期 Ian Austin 被捕以及難以尋獲其位置的情況，顯示出該設施在溝通上缺乏透明度。州長 Sherrill 為使用州警辯護，強調這是防止更多暴力並避免更大規模聯邦干預的必要步驟。

From a historical point of view, Professor Jessica Ordaz explains that these conditions are not unusual. Instead, she argues that they are part of a long history of how migrants have been imprisoned. She notes that since the 19th century, there has been a pattern of forced labor and food deprivation. While the methods of resistance have changed—moving from escaping to the organized hunger strikes seen in the 1960s—the cycle of repression continues. Professor Ordaz suggests that simply removing agencies like ICE would not solve the deeper causes of migration and detention.

從歷史角度來看，Jessica Ordaz 教授解釋說這些情況並不罕見。相反，她認為這是移民被囚禁之悠久歷史的一部分。她指出，自 19 世紀以來，一直存在強迫勞動和剝奪食物的模式。雖然反抗方式有所改變——從逃跑轉變為 1960 年代出現的組織化絕食——但壓制的循環仍在持續。Ordaz 教授建議，僅僅撤除如 ICE 這樣的機構並不能解決移民與拘留的深層原因。

The situation remains unresolved, as federal authorities deny the claims of misconduct while protests and strikes continue.

由於聯邦當局否認有不當行為，而抗議與罷工仍在持續，情況依然未獲解決。