A judge in Wake County Superior Court has dismissed a lawsuit filed by 31 former male athletes. The athletes claimed they experienced sexual abuse and harassment by a former university sports medicine director.

韋克郡高等法院的一名法官駁回了 31 名前男性運動員提起的訴訟。這些運動員聲稱他們遭受了前大學體育醫學主任的性虐待與騷擾。

The legal case began with a 2022 federal complaint by athlete Benjamin Locke and later grew to include 31 people, most of whom are keeping their identities secret. The accusations focus on Robert M. Murphy Jr., who directed sports medicine from 2012 to 2022. The plaintiffs claimed that Mr. Murphy engaged in inappropriate physical contact during medical treatments and drug tests. Furthermore, they emphasized that university officials were negligent because they failed to act on reports of this behavior.

這起法律案件始於運動員 Benjamin Locke 在 2022 年提出的聯邦申訴，隨後擴大至 31 人，其中大多數人選擇隱匿身分。指控焦點在於 2012 年至 2022 年間領導體育醫學的 Robert M. Murphy Jr.。原告聲稱 Murphy 先生在醫療治療和藥物檢測過程中進行了不恰當的肢體接觸。此外，他們強調大學校方存在疏忽，因為校方未能針對這些行為的報告採取行動。

Judge Bryan Collins dismissed the case based on two main legal reasons. First, the court ruled that claims about events from 2013 were too old to be heard because the statute of limitations had expired. Second, the judge decided that claims against athletic directors, such as Debbie Yow and Boo Corrigan, were filed in the wrong court. He explained that since N.C. State is a public institution, these workplace disputes must be handled by the North Carolina Industrial Commission instead of a civil court.

法官 Bryan Collins 基於兩個主要法律原因駁回了此案。首先，法院裁定關於 2013 年事件的指控因已過追訴期而過於陳舊，無法受理。其次，法官決定針對體育總監（如 Debbie Yow 和 Boo Corrigan）的指控是在錯誤的法院提起的。他解釋，由於北卡州立大學是公立機構，這些職場糾紛必須由北卡羅來納州工業委員會處理，而非民事法院。

Lawyers for both sides have different views on the ruling. Mr. Murphy's lawyer described the allegations as false and harmful to his professional reputation. In contrast, the plaintiffs' lawyer, Kerry Sutton, asserted that the dismissal was based on legal technicalities rather than the actual facts of the abuse. Meanwhile, the university administration stated that it opposes all sexual misconduct and agrees with the judge's legal decision.

雙方律師對此裁決持有不同看法。Murphy 先生的律師將這些指控描述為虛假且損害其專業名聲。相反，原告律師 Kerry Sutton 主張，駁回是基於法律程序上的技術問題，而非虐待的實際事實。與此同時，大學行政部門表示反對所有性不端行為，並同意法官的法律裁定。

The case was dismissed due to procedural and jurisdictional issues, although the plaintiffs have stated they plan to appeal and add more claims.

該案因程序與管轄權問題被駁回，儘管原告已表示計劃上訴並增加更多指控。