Testimony of Former Assistant Lesley Groff Regarding Jeffrey Epstein
前助理 Lesley Groff 關於 Jeffrey Epstein 的證詞
Introduction
Lesley Groff, who worked as Jeffrey Epstein's long-term executive assistant, gave private testimony to the US House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform on June 9, 2026.
長期擔任 Jeffrey Epstein 行政助理的 Lesley Groff，於 2026 年 6 月 9 日向美國眾議院監督與政府改革委員會提供了私人證詞。
Main Body
Department of Justice records show that Lesley Groff held a central role in Epstein's organization, as her name appears more than 160,000 times in the files. From 2001 to 2019, Groff managed the financier's daily business, which included organizing travel, arranging meetings with powerful global figures, and scheduling massages. Although FBI documents and survivor accounts suggest these massages were actually a cover for sexual abuse, Groff has always claimed she did not know about these crimes. Her lawyer, Michael Bachner, emphasized that Epstein intentionally kept Groff away from his illegal activities to make his business look legitimate.
司法部記錄顯示，Lesley Groff 在 Epstein 的組織中扮演核心角色，因為她的名字在文件中出現了超過 16 萬次。從 2001 年到 2019 年，Groff 管理這位金融家的日常業務，包括組織行程、安排與全球權勢人物會面以及預約按摩。雖然 FBI 文件和倖存者陳述暗示這些按摩實際上是性虐待的掩護，但 Groff 始終聲稱她對這些罪行不知情。
During the committee meetings, Groff provided details about the people associated with Epstein. Specifically, she testified that she arranged several phone calls between Epstein and Donald Trump before the 2016 US presidential election. Furthermore, while Groff was mentioned in FBI documents as a possible co-conspirator and appeared in several civil lawsuits, those cases were eventually dismissed and she has never been charged with a crime. This inquiry is part of a larger effort to find the truth, which includes testimony from other associates and an investigation into activities at the Zorro Ranch estate.
在委員會會議期間，Groff 提供了關於與 Epstein 相關人士的詳細資訊。具體而言，她證稱在 2016 年美國總統大選之前，她為 Epstein 與 Donald Trump 安排了多次電話通訊。此外，雖然 Groff 在 FBI 文件中被提到可能是共犯，並出現在多起民事訴訟中，但這些案件最終均被撤銷，她從未被指控犯罪。此次調查是尋找真相之更大努力的一部分，其中包括其他相關人士的證詞以及對 Zorro Ranch 莊園活動的調查。
Conclusion
The situation remains controversial, as some committee members believe Groff's testimony is convincing, whereas others argue that her claims of ignorance are unlikely given how closely she worked with Epstein.
情況依然充滿爭議，因為部分委員會成員認為 Groff 的證詞具有說服力，而其他人則認為，鑑於她與 Epstein 合作如此緊密，她聲稱不知情的說法並不合理。
Vocabulary Learning
⚡ The 'Professional Connector' Shift
To move from A2 to B2, you must stop using simple words like and, but, and because for every sentence. The text provides a perfect roadmap for using Formal Transition Markers. These words act as bridges that make your English sound sophisticated and organized.
🛠️ The Tool Kit
| A2 Word (Basic) | B2 Upgrade (From Text) | How to use it |
|---|---|---|
| Also / And | Furthermore | Use this to add a second, more important point. |
| But | Whereas | Use this to show a direct contrast between two different opinions. |
| Specifically | Specifically | Use this to move from a general idea to a precise detail. |
🔍 Deep Dive: The Power of 'Whereas'
At A2, you might say: "Some people like him, but others don't."
At B2, you use whereas to balance two opposing facts in one elegant sentence:
"Some committee members believe Groff's testimony is convincing, whereas others argue that her claims... are unlikely."
The Logic: Whereas doesn't just mean 'but'; it creates a mirror effect, comparing two different perspectives simultaneously.
🚀 Quick Application Guide
If you want to sound like a B2 speaker, replace your simple connectors using this logic:
- General Statement
SpecificallyDetailed Fact - Point A
FurthermoreStronger Point B - Opinion X
WhereasOpinion Y