Recent reports and a documentary have revealed a widespread network of third-party managers who use pressure and violence to exploit content creators on the OnlyFans platform.

最近的報告和一部紀錄片揭露了一個廣泛的第三方經紀人網絡，他們利用壓力與暴力來剝削 OnlyFans 平台上的內容創作者。

The rise of 'OnlyFans Managers' (OFMs) has created a market where agents promise to increase a creator's income in exchange for a large share of their earnings, often between 30% and 70%. However, evidence shows that these professional deals often become abusive. By taking control of account passwords, managers can hide the actual amount of money earned and change banking details to steal funds.

「OnlyFans 經紀人」(OFMs) 的興起創造了一個市場，經紀人承諾能增加創作者的收入，以換取其高額的分成，通常在 30% 至 70% 之間。然而，證據顯示這些專業協議往往演變成虐待。經紀人透過控制帳號密碼，可以隱瞞實際獲利金額，並更改銀行帳號以盜取資金。

Testimonies from victims show that this situation often leads to severe abuse. Some creators reported psychological manipulation and were forced to produce explicit content against their will. In one extreme case, masked attackers were sent to a creator's home after she tried to regain control of her account. Furthermore, messages from a Telegram group called 'OFM Empire' show that managers share strategies to control creators, including selling creator contracts to other agents without permission.

受害者的證詞顯示，這種情況經常導致嚴重的虐待。部分創作者舉報遭受心理操縱，並被強迫製作違背意願的露骨內容。在一個極端案例中，一名創作者在嘗試重新取得帳號控制權後，竟有戴面具的攻擊者前往其家中。此外，一個名為「OFM Empire」的 Telegram 群組訊息顯示，經紀人會分享控制創作者的策略，包括在未經許可的情況下將創作者的合約轉賣給其他經紀人。

Responses from authorities have been mixed. Fenix International Limited, the company that runs OnlyFans, claims it is not responsible for external contracts and insists its safety rules are enough. On the other hand, legal experts and the UK's anti-slavery commissioner argue that the platform may be breaking the law by failing to stop this exploitation. Because OFMs are not licensed or regulated, critics argue that a dangerous gap exists that allows this predatory behavior to continue.

當局的反應不一。營運 OnlyFans 的 Fenix International Limited 公司聲稱其對外部合約不負責任，並堅持其安全規則已足夠。另一方面，法律專家與英國反奴隸專員則認為，該平台因未能阻止此類剝削而可能違法。由於 OFM 並未經過許可或監管，批評者認為這造成了一個危險漏洞，導致此類掠奪行為得以持續。

The situation remains dangerous, as creators face a high risk of abuse while the platform continues to distance itself from the problem.

情況依然危險，因為創作者面臨高度被虐待的風險，而平台則繼續與此問題保持距離。