The Knesset has voted to give parliamentary immunity to Likud Member of Knesset (MK) Tally Gotliv. This decision effectively stops criminal legal proceedings against her for revealing the identity of a Shin Bet officer without permission.

國會已投票決定授予利庫德黨國會議員 Tally Gotliv 議會豁免權。此決定有效地停止了針對她未經許可透露辛貝特（Shin Bet）官員身份的刑事法律程序。

The legal process began in May when Attorney-General Gali Baharav-Miara filed an indictment. She claimed that MK Gotliv broke the Shin Bet Law by publishing the identity of a security official. The Attorney-General emphasized that these actions created a serious security risk during a time of active conflict. Furthermore, a secret report from the Shin Bet stated that the disclosure put the officer and his family in danger. While MK Gotliv admitted to revealing the identity, she argued that her actions were justified because they were part of her duties as a member of parliament.

法律程序始於五月，當時總檢察長 Gali Baharav-Miara 提出起訴書。她指控 Gotliv 議員透過公布一名安全官員的身份，違反了《辛貝特法》。總檢察長強調，在衝突期間，這些行為造成了嚴重的安全風險。此外，辛貝特的一份秘密報告指出，此項披露使該名官員及其家人陷入危險。雖然 Gotliv 議員承認披露了身份，但她主張其行為是履行國會議員職責的一部分，因此具有正當性。

After three hearings, the House Committee recommended immunity, and the Knesset plenum later approved this with two separate votes. Most members of the coalition supported the move; however, MK Yuli Edelstein abstained because he worried this could set a dangerous precedent for other politicians. Meanwhile, opposition lawmakers and the Movement for Quality Government criticized the decision. They asserted that parliamentary immunity should protect legislative work, not shield people from criminal charges related to security breaches.

經過三次聽證會後，議會委員會建議授予豁免權，隨後國會全體會議通過兩次獨立投票予以批准。大多數執政聯盟成員支持此舉；然而，Yuli Edelstein 議員選擇棄權，因為他擔心這可能會為其他政治人物開創一個危險的先例。與此同時，反對黨議員與「優質政府運動」批評此決定。他們主張，議會豁免權應保護立法工作，而非掩蓋與安全漏洞相關的刑事指控。

Consequently, the affected Shin Bet officer has filed a petition with the High Court of Justice. The officer argues that the immunity process was politically decided and legally flawed. He claims that the decision harms the security of the intelligence community by suggesting that the identities of secret agents can be exposed for political reasons. Therefore, he is asking the court to cancel the Knesset's decision and restart the criminal trial.

因此，受影響的辛貝特官員已向最高法院提交請願書。該官員主張豁免權的程序是由政治決定且在法律上存在缺陷。他聲稱，此決定暗示秘密特工的身份可因政治原因而被揭露，從而損害情報界的安全。因此，他請求法院撤銷國會的決定並重新啟動刑事審判。

MK Tally Gotliv now has parliamentary immunity, but the High Court will now decide if this status is legal following the petition from the security official.

Tally Gotliv 議員目前擁有議會豁免權，但在安全官員提交請願後，最高法院將決定此身分是否合法。