During the 62nd session of the UN Human Rights Council, India officially questioned whether the 1960 Indus Waters Treaty is still relevant. Additionally, India provided a critical review of Pakistan's internal government and security policies.

在聯合國人權理事會第 62 屆會議期間，印度正式質詢 1960 年的《印度河水協定》是否仍然適用。此外，印度對巴基斯坦內部政府與安全政策提出了批判性評論。

The diplomatic discussion began when India used its 'Right of Reply' to respond to statements made by Pakistan and the Organisation of Islamic Cooperation (OIC) about Jammu and Kashmir. First Secretary Anupama Singh asserted that Jammu and Kashmir is an inseparable part of India. She emphasized that the only remaining dispute is the return of Indian territories currently controlled by Pakistan. Furthermore, Singh claimed that Pakistan continues to host and train terrorists, noting that these claims are supported by statements from Pakistan's own Defence Minister. She described Pakistan as a 'Frankenstein state,' suggesting that its support for militancy has caused its own domestic instability.

外交討論始於印度行使「答辯權」以回應巴基斯坦與伊斯蘭合作組織（OIC）關於查謨-克什米爾的聲明。第一書記 Anupama Singh 堅稱查謨-克什米爾是印度不可分割的一部分。她強調目前唯一 remaining 的爭議，在於巴基斯坦目前控制之印度領土的歸還。此外，Singh 聲稱巴基斯坦持續接納並訓練恐怖分子，並指出這些主張有巴基斯坦國防部長本人的聲明支持。她將巴基斯坦形容為一個「法蘭肯斯坦國家」，暗示其對激進主義的支持導致了自身的國內不穩定。

In addition to security issues, the Indian mission highlighted the worsening humanitarian conditions in Pakistan-occupied Kashmir, specifically in Rawalakot. India argued that the government there uses force to stop people from demanding basic services and human rights. At the same time, India questioned the validity of the 1960 Indus Waters Treaty. The administration contended that the agreement is an outdated technical arrangement and should not be seen as a permanent right. Singh argued that it is illogical to continue the treaty if the benefiting state uses terrorism as a policy tool. She also noted that the pact does not consider modern challenges, such as climate change and new technology.

除安全問題外，印度代表團還強調了巴基斯坦佔領之克什米爾（特別是 Rawalakot）人道主義狀況的惡化。印度認為當地政府使用武力阻止人民要求基本服務與人權。同時，印度質詢 1960 年《印度河水協定》的有效性。印度政府認為該協議是一項過時的技術安排，不應被視為永久權利。Singh 主張，若受益國將恐怖主義作為政策工具，繼續執行該協定是不合理的。她還指出，該協定未考慮現代挑戰，例如氣候變遷與新技術。

India maintains that the Indus Waters Treaty needs to be re-evaluated and insists that Pakistan should focus on stabilizing its own country rather than using international diplomacy.

印度堅持認為《印度河水協定》需要重新評估，並主張巴基斯坦應專注於穩定自身國家，而非利用國際外交。