Leading athletes from the ATP and WTA tours have signaled a potential boycott of Grand Slam tournaments due to disputes regarding prize money and institutional respect.

ATP 與 WTA 巡迴賽的頂尖選手表示，由於獎金與體制尊重方面的爭議，他們可能會抵制大滿貫賽事。

The current friction originates from a perceived inadequacy in the revenue-sharing model employed by the four major tournaments. A collective of top-10 ranked players, including Jannik Sinner and Aryna Sabalenka, asserted that the prize money at Roland-Garros constitutes less than 15% of total revenue, failing to meet their demand of 22%—a figure aligned with ATP and WTA 1000 events. Specifically, players claim that the revenue share at the French Open declined from 15.5% in 2024 to a projected 14.9% by 2026, despite a nominal increase in the total prize pool to 61.7 million euros. This financial discrepancy is compounded by a perceived lack of institutional responsiveness; Sinner noted that a formal request for dialogue submitted a year prior had not yielded a satisfactory conclusion.

目前的摩擦源於四大賽所採用的收入分成模式被認為不足。包括辛納 (Jannik Sinner) 與薩巴蓮卡 (Aryna Sabalenka) 在內的十大排名選手集體主張，法賽的獎金佔總收入不足 15%，未能達到他們要求的 22%——此數字與 ATP 及 WTA 1000 賽事一致。具體而言，選手聲稱法網的收入分成從 2024 年的 15.5% 下降至 2026 年預計的 14.9%，儘管總獎金名義上增加至 6,170 萬歐元。這種財務差距加上對體制缺乏回應的感受，使情況更加複雜；辛納指出，一年前提交的正式對話請求至今尚未達成滿意的結論。

Should a boycott be implemented, the operational impact would be multifaceted. While the tournament draws would likely remain full due to the incentive for lower-ranked players to secure points and capital, the absence of premier stars would diminish the probability of high-profile champions. Historically, such actions occurred in 1973 when 81 players withdrew from Wimbledon in solidarity with Nikola Pilić. In a contemporary context, participants would face significant ranking point attrition, as the failure to defend previous titles would result in a precipitous drop in standings. However, the ATP and WTA possess the authority to withdraw ranking points entirely, as demonstrated during the 2022 exclusion of Russian and Belarusian athletes.

若實施抵制，其對運作的影響將是多方面的。雖然由於排名較低的選手有動力獲取積分與獎金，賽事對陣表可能會維持滿額，但頂級球星的缺席將降低出現高知名度冠軍的可能性。歷史上，此類行動曾於 1973 年發生，當時有 81 名選手為聲援尼古拉·皮利奇 (Nikola Pilić) 而退出溫布頓。在當代背景下，參與者將面臨顯著的排名分流失，因為未能衛冕之前的冠軍將導致排名大幅下跌。然而，ATP 與 WTA 擁有完全撤銷排名分的權限，正如 2022 年將俄羅斯與白俄羅斯運動員排除在外的情況所示。

From a fiscal perspective, the Grand Slams maintain substantial leverage through long-term media rights contracts and established brand equity. For instance, the French Open's agreement with Warner Bros. Discovery extends to 2035, and the U.S. Open's deal with ESPN lasts until 2037. Consequently, a short-term boycott is unlikely to disrupt immediate broadcast revenues, although prolonged absence of elite talent could influence future contract valuations. While some players, such as Emma Raducanu, have expressed opposition to such measures, others, including Coco Gauff, have cited the successful collective bargaining models of the WNBA as a potential blueprint for professional tennis.

從財務角度來看，大滿貫賽事透過長期媒體權利合約與既有的品牌價值維持著強大的籌碼。例如，法網與華納兄弟探索 (Warner Bros. Discovery) 的協議延伸至 2035 年，而美網與 ESPN 的交易則持續到 2037 年。因此，短期抵制不太可能干擾即時的轉播收入，但頂尖人才的長期缺席可能會影響未來的合約估值。雖然部分選手如拉杜卡努 (Emma Raducanu) 對此類措施表示反對，但其他選手如高芙 (Coco Gauff) 則將 WNBA 成功的集體談判模式視為職業網球的潛在藍圖。

The situation remains a stalemate, with players utilizing the proximity of the French Open to exert pressure on organizers while no formal plan for a boycott has been ratified.

目前情況陷入僵局，選手利用法網即將開賽之機向主辦方施壓，但尚未批准正式的抵制計劃。