Ryanair has modified its seating policy for families to eliminate mandatory fees for parents traveling with children, following an investigation by the UK's Competition and Markets Authority (CMA).

在英國競爭與市場管理局 (CMA) 調查後，Ryanair 修改了家庭座位政策，取消了父母攜帶兒童旅行時的強制性費用。

The modification follows a CMA inquiry into whether Ryanair's previous requirement—wherein adults traveling with children aged two to eleven paid a reservation fee, typically £8 per leg, to secure adjacent seating—constituted a breach of consumer law. The regulator sought to determine if such charges improperly monetized the airline's obligations regarding child safety and disability regulations. The CMA further posited that Ryanair was the sole major carrier operating within the UK to implement such a fee structure.

此次修改源於 CMA 調查 Ryanair 之前的要求——即攜帶兩至十一歲兒童的成年人需支付預訂費（通常每段航程 8 英鎊）以確保相鄰座位——是否構成違反消費者法。監管機構旨在確定此類費用是否不當地將航空公司關於兒童安全和殘障規定之義務貨幣化。CMA 進一步指出，Ryanair 是唯一一家在英國營運且實施此類收費結構的主要航空公司。

Under the revised framework, adults may now be allocated seats adjacent to their children without charge, provided this occurs after the check-in process. However, the airline has specified that such non-paid allocations will predominantly be situated in the rear of the aircraft, as forward sections are prioritized for paid reservations. The option to secure specific forward seating via a reservation fee remains available.

在修訂後的框架下，成年人現在可以在辦理登機手續後免費獲分配與孩子相鄰的座位。然而，航空公司明確表示，此類免費分配的座位將主要位於飛機後方，因為前方區域將優先提供給付費預訂。透過支付預訂費來確保特定前方座位的選項依然保留。

Institutional responses to these changes have been divergent. Chief Executive Michael O'Leary characterized the CMA's intervention as 'misguided' and asserted that the previous policy provided superior transparency and certainty for consumers. He contended that the airline is reluctantly adopting an industry standard that he deems less consumer-friendly. Conversely, the consumer advocacy organization Which? maintained that the previous charges were unjustified and indicated that it will monitor the implementation of the new policy to ensure compliance.

各機構對這些變動的反應分歧。執行長 Michael O'Leary 將 CMA 的干預形容為「誤導」，並主張之前的政策為消費者提供了更高的透明度和確定性。他認為航空公司是在勉強採取一個他認為對消費者較不友好的行業標準。相反地，消費者權益組織 Which? 堅持認為之前的收費是不合理的，並表示將監控新政策的執行以確保合規。

Ryanair has transitioned to a standard industry seating model for families to resolve regulatory tensions with the CMA, though it maintains that the change will not impact its revenue.

Ryanair 已轉向標準的行業家庭座位模式，以解決與 CMA 之間的監管緊張關係，儘管其維持該變動不會影響其收入。