Recent administrative findings in Uttar Pradesh and judicial observations in Punjab and Haryana indicate significant failures in the verification and issuance of safety and completion certificates for commercial properties.

最近在北方邦的行政調查以及在旁遮普邦和哈里亞納邦的司法觀察顯示，商業物業在核實與核發安全及完工證明方面存在嚴重缺失。

In Uttar Pradesh, the Directorate of Power Safety has identified a critical lack of synchronization between electricity distribution utilities and safety regulatory bodies. Between June 1 and 23, 3,252 commercial power connections were activated, yet no corresponding safety clearances were recorded. This institutional disconnect is exacerbated by the absence of an integrated digital verification platform, rendering the Directorate unable to ascertain the legitimacy of clearances in real-time. The Aliganj fire incident served as a catalyst for this discovery, revealing that certain No Objection Certificates (NOCs) were forged or erroneously attributed to other consumers. Consequently, authorities are now conducting a retrospective audit of commercial connections, with particular emphasis on high-load installations exceeding 50 kW and those approved via manual processes prior to 2022. In Lucknow, the Lucknow Electricity Supply Administration has issued notices to 489 commercial entities for exceeding sanctioned loads and failing to provide fire safety documentation.

在北方邦，電力安全局發現了電力分配公司與安全監管機構之間嚴重缺乏同步。在6月1日至23日期間，共有3,252個商業電力連接被啟動，但卻沒有記錄到相對應的安全許可。由於缺乏一個整合的數位核實平台，這種制度上的脫節更加嚴重，導致電力安全局無法即時確定許可證的合法性。Aliganj火災事故成為了此次發現的催化劑，揭露了部分不反對證明書（NOC）為偽造，或被錯誤地歸屬於其他用戶。因此，當局目前正對商業連接進行回溯審計，特別著重於超過50 kW的高負荷裝置，以及在2022年之前透過手動程序批准的項目。在勒克瑙，勒克瑙電力供應管理局已向489家商業實體發出通知，指其超過核准負荷且未能提供消防安全文件。

Parallelly, the State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (SCRC) has critiqued the issuance of conditional occupation and completion certificates by authorities such as the Greater Mohali Area Development Authority (GMADA). The SCRC posits that the premature granting of these certificates allows developers to impose maintenance fees on consumers despite the absence of essential infrastructure and fire safety systems. The commission noted that the subsequent issuance of notices or the sealing of projects by authorities confirms that such certifications were granted despite non-compliance with statutory norms. The SCRC has therefore mandated a more rigorous accountability framework to ensure that certifications are not treated as provisional permissions but as definitive attestations of legal habitability.

與此同時，州消費者爭議救濟委員會（SCRC）批評了由大莫哈利地區發展局（GMADA）等機構核發的有條件入住與完工證明。SCRC認為，過早授予這些證明，使得開發商在缺乏基本基礎設施與消防安全系統的情況下，仍能向消費者收取維護費。委員會指出，隨後當局發出通知或封閉項目，證明了此類認證在不符合法定標準的情況下被授予。因此，SCRC要求建立一個更嚴格的問責框架，以確保認證不被視為臨時許可，而是作為法律可居住性的最終證明。

Regulatory bodies in multiple states are currently attempting to rectify systemic gaps in safety certification and infrastructural oversight to mitigate public risk.

多個州的監管機構目前正嘗試修正安全認證與基礎設施監管方面的系統性漏洞，以降低公眾風險。