Former Washington state attorney Alexandra Lozano and her defunct firm, Luz del Camino Legal, are the subjects of multiple lawsuits and federal investigations regarding the alleged fraudulent procurement of humanitarian visas for thousands of immigrants.

前華盛頓州律師 Alexandra Lozano 及其已倒閉的事務所 Luz del Camino Legal，目前是多項訴訟與聯邦調查的對象，涉及指控其為數千名移民欺詐申請人道主義簽證。

The litigation, including the proposed class action Diaz Toscano v. Lozano Kennedy and the individual suit Sanchez v. Kennedy, posits that Lozano operated an industrialized legal enterprise designed to maximize revenue through the exploitation of vulnerable populations. The plaintiffs allege that the firm utilized social media platforms and religious iconography—specifically referencing the Virgen de Guadalupe—to establish a facade of trust and promise 'miraculous' outcomes. This marketing strategy purportedly funneled clients into a standardized intake process where sales representatives, rather than licensed attorneys, determined eligibility for relief.

相關訴訟，包括擬議的集體訴訟 Diaz Toscano v. Lozano Kennedy 及個人訴訟 Sanchez v. Kennedy，認為 Lozano 經營了一項工業化的法律企業，旨在透過剝削弱勢群體來最大化收益。原告指控該事務所利用社交媒體平台與宗教圖標——特別是提到瓜達露佩聖母（Virgen de Guadalupe）——來建立信任的假象並承諾「奇蹟般」的結果。據稱這種行銷策略將客戶誘導至標準化的接洽流程中，由銷售代表而非持有執照的律師決定是否符合救濟資格。

Central to the allegations is the systemic fabrication of eligibility criteria for Violence Against Women Act (VAWA) self-petitions and T visas. The lawsuits contend that the firm exaggerated or invented narratives of extreme cruelty and human trafficking to satisfy statutory requirements, often without the clients' informed consent. Furthermore, the complaints cite the unauthorized reproduction of digital signatures on official documents and the employment of unlicensed personnel in Colombia, Mexico, and Argentina to provide legal counsel. Such procedural irregularities have reportedly resulted in the denial of applications and the initiation of removal proceedings for numerous clients.

指控的核心在於系統性地捏造《女性暴力對抗法案》（VAWA）自我請願書與 T 簽證的資格準則。訴訟稱該事務所誇大或虛構極端殘酷對待與人口販賣的敘述以滿足法定要求，且通常未經客戶的知情同意。此外，申訴書指出其在官方文件中擅自複製數位簽名，並在哥倫比亞、墨西哥與阿根廷僱用無執照人員提供法律諮詢。據報導，此類程序違規已導致許多客戶的申請被拒，並啟動了驅逐程序。

Institutional responses indicate a broader trend of humanitarian visa fraud. U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) reported a significant increase in T, U, and VAWA filings during the Biden administration, which the agency characterizes as a surge in fraudulent claims. Consequently, the Department of Homeland Security has prioritized the identification of such abuses. In response to these developments, Lozano resigned from the Washington State Bar in May and was subsequently suspended by the Board of Immigration Appeals on June 18. Her legal representative, Angelo Calfo, maintains that clients were responsible for reviewing their applications and asserts that Lozano acted in the interests of her clientele.

機構回應顯示人道主義簽證欺詐呈現更廣泛的趨勢。美國公民及移民服務局（USCIS）報告指，在拜登政府期間，T、U 與 VAWA 的申請量顯著增加，該局將其定性為欺詐申報激增。因此，國土安全部已將識別此類濫用行為列為優先事項。針對這些發展，Lozano 於 5 月辭去華盛頓州律師公會的職務，隨後於 6 月 18 日被移民上訴委員會停職。其法律代表 Angelo Calfo 主張客戶應負責核對其申請書，並聲稱 Lozano 的行為是為了客戶的利益。

Alexandra Lozano has surrendered her law license amid ongoing federal investigations and civil litigation seeking damages for systemic malpractice and fraud.

在聯邦調查以及尋求系統性執業失當與欺詐損害賠償的民事訴訟中，Alexandra Lozano 已交還其律師執照。