The Royal Commission on Antisemitism and Social Cohesion has conducted hearings regarding the efficacy of online safety regulations and the prevalence of targeted harassment against members of the Jewish community.

反猶太主義與社會凝聚力皇家委員會已針對網路安全法規的成效，以及針對猶太社區成員之目標性騷擾之普遍程度舉行聆訊。

The eSafety Commissioner, Julie Inman Grant, testified to a systemic deterioration in the cooperation of mainstream social media platforms, specifically citing X Corp. The Commissioner asserted that platforms are increasingly prioritizing the monetization of 'gore' and 'fringe' content over safety protocols, noting that X Corp characterized footage of the Bondi terror attack as comparable to cinematic gore. This friction is compounded by a perceived shift in the regulatory climate under the United States administration and a reduction in trust and safety personnel. Furthermore, the Commissioner identified a critical deficiency in the Adult Cyber Abuse Scheme; the current legal threshold for intervention is so stringent that only 2% of complaints result in removal notices. Consequently, the administration advocated for a revised 'online hate code' to shift accountability toward platforms.

網路安全專員 Julie Inman Grant 證稱，主流社交媒體平台的合作情況出現系統性惡化，特別是 X Corp。專員斷言，平台日益將「血腥」與「邊緣」內容的貨幣化優先於安全協定，並指出 X Corp 將邦代（Bondi）恐怖襲擊的片段形容為與電影血腥畫面相當。這種摩擦因美國政府領導下監管氣候的感知轉變以及信任與安全人員的減少而加劇。此外，專員指出「成人網路欺凌計劃」存在嚴重缺陷；目前的法律介入門檻過高，導致僅有 2% 的投كره結果為發出移除通知。因此，管理層主張修訂「網路仇恨守則」，將問責責任轉向平台。

Parallel testimony from Sarah Schwartz, Executive Director of the Jewish Council of Australia, highlighted the intersection of political advocacy and targeted vilification. Schwartz reported a coordinated campaign of abuse from both neo-Nazi actors and pro-Israel advocates, the latter of whom utilized descriptors such as 'traitor' and 'self-hating' to penalize her criticism of Israeli state conduct in Gaza. This phenomenon suggests a perceived conflation of Jewish identity with support for the Israeli government, which Schwartz argued creates a chilling effect on political expression within the community. The testimony also noted a failure in the intersection of law enforcement and media; a personal protection order initiated by Victoria Police was subsequently publicized by The Australian, which republished offensive imagery and characterized the legal measure as an attempt to suppress free speech, ultimately leading to the order's withdrawal.

澳洲猶太委員會執行董事 Sarah Schwartz 的平行證詞，突顯了政治倡議與目標性誹謗的交集。Schwartz 報告稱，新納粹分子與支持以色列的倡議者均發起了一場協調一致的辱罵行動，後者使用「叛徒」和「自我憎恨」等描述，以懲罰她對以色列政府在加薩行為的批評。這種現象顯示猶太身份被視為與支持以色列政府相混淆，Schwartz 認為這對社區內的政治表達產生了寒蟬效應。證詞還提到執法部門與媒體接軌的失敗；由維多利亞州警方發起的個人保護令隨後被《澳洲人報》公開，該報重新發布了冒犯性圖像，並將此法律措施定性為企圖壓制言論自由，最終導致該保護令被撤回。

Regarding institutional coordination, the Commission identified inconsistencies in the operational rapprochement between the eSafety Commissioner and various police jurisdictions. While the New South Wales Police maintain a formal memorandum of understanding (MOU), Western Australia Police reported that such an agreement remained unfinalized due to administrative restructuring and geographical disparities. The Australian Federal Police indicated that while the relationship is positive, there is a requirement for enhanced coordination protocols.

關於機構協調，委員會發現網路安全專員與各個警區之間的運作協調存在不一致。雖然新南威爾斯州警方維持一份正式的諒解備忘錄（MOU），但西澳警方報告稱，由於行政重組與地理差異，此類協議尚未敲定。澳洲聯邦警方表示，雖然關係正面，但仍需強化協調協定。

The proceedings underscore a significant gap between existing regulatory frameworks and the operational realities of global digital platforms, alongside the complex nature of intra-community political conflict.

此次程序凸顯了現有監管框架與全球數位平台運作現實之間的顯著差距，以及社區內部政治衝突的複雜性質。