The Holy See has formally excommunicated the leadership and adhering members of the Society of St. Pius X (SSPX) following the unauthorized consecration of four bishops in Switzerland.

在瑞士未經授權祝聖四位主教後，聖座正式將聖庇護十世會（SSPX）的領導層及追隨成員處以絕頂處分。

The current rupture is predicated upon the SSPX's rejection of the liturgical and ecumenical reforms instituted by the Second Vatican Council (1962–1965). This ideological divergence manifests primarily in the society's insistence upon the preconciliar Tridentine Latin Mass and its opposition to the use of vernacular languages in liturgy. The immediate catalyst for the current crisis occurred on July 1, when the SSPX consecrated four prelates—Pascal Schreiber, Michael Goldade, Michel Poinsinet de Sivry, and Marc Hanappier—without a papal mandate. This act followed a formal appeal from Pope Leo XIV, who characterized the proposed action as a 'sin of extreme gravity' and a threat to ecclesial unity.

目前的決裂是基於 SSPX 拒絕第二次梵蒂岡大公會議（1962–1965）所制定的禮儀與普世主義改革。這種意識形態的分歧，主要體現在該會堅持使用議會前的特 Rent 時代拉丁彌撒，並反對在禮儀中使用當地語言。

Historically, this incident mirrors a 1988 schism involving the society's founder, Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre. While subsequent pontiffs, including Benedict XVI and Francis, attempted various forms of rapprochement—such as the liberalization of the Latin Rite or the granting of limited faculties for confessions and marriages—these concessions have been revoked by the current administration. The Vatican has now declared the sacraments of marriage and penance administered by SSPX clergy to be invalid.

從歷史來看，這次事件與 1988 年涉及該會創始人馬塞爾·列法夫爾（Marcel Lefebvre）總主教的分裂非常相似。雖然隨後的教宗，包括本篤十六世與方濟各，嘗試過各種形式的和解——例如放寬拉丁禮儀，或賦予有限度的告解與結婚權限——但這些讓步已被現任管理層撤銷。梵蒂岡現已宣佈，由 SSPX 神職人員主持的結婚與懺悔聖事為無效。

Within the United States, the implications of this decree are multifaceted. While the Vatican has clarified that mere attendance at SSPX chapels does not automatically incur excommunication, those who 'formally adhere' to the society's doctrinal positions are considered schismatic. In contrast, parishes such as Saint Agnes in St. Paul, Minnesota, demonstrate a model of coexistence, where the traditional Latin Mass is celebrated with archdiocesan approval, thereby distinguishing liturgical preference from doctrinal rebellion. Stakeholder responses vary from a 'crisis of conscience' among the laity to a perceived vindication of principled traditionalism.

在美國境內，這項法令的影響是多方面的。雖然梵蒂岡已澄清，僅僅參加 SSPX 禮拜堂並不 automatically 導致絕頂處分，但那些「正式追隨」該會教義立場的人被視為分裂者。相反，如明尼蘇達州聖保羅市的聖艾格尼絲堂（Saint Agnes）則展示了一種共存模式，在那裡，傳統拉丁彌撒是在獲得總教區批准的情況下舉行的，從而將禮儀偏好與教義反叛區分開來。利益相關者的反應不一，從信徒間的「良心危機」到被視為對原則傳統主義的證明。

The Catholic Church remains in a state of formal rupture with the SSPX, though the Vatican has established specific protocols for the readmission of clergy and laity into full communion.

天主教會與 SSPX 仍處於正式決裂狀態，但梵蒂岡已制定特定協議，以利神職人員與信徒重新恢復完全共融。