National Investigation Agency Files Supplementary Charges Against Hafiz Saeed Regarding Pahalgam Incident
國家調查局就帕哈尔甘事件對哈菲茲·塞義德提起補充起訴
Introduction
The National Investigation Agency (NIA) has submitted a supplementary charge sheet to a special court in Jammu, formally accusing Hafiz Saeed of orchestrating a lethal assault in Pahalgam.
國家調查局(NIA)已向查謨特別法院提交一份補充起訴書,正式指控哈菲茲·塞義德策劃在帕哈尔甘發生的致命襲擊。
Main Body
The legal proceedings target Hafiz Saeed in both a personal capacity and as the leader of Lashkar-e-Taiba (LeT) and its affiliate, The Resistance Front (TRF). The NIA has invoked the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967, and the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, specifically citing the waging of war against the Indian state and the formulation of cross-border conspiracies. This supplementary filing expands upon a primary 1,597-page document submitted on December 15, 2025, which established the operational framework of the April 22, 2025, attack. The agency asserts that the incident, which resulted in the deaths of 25 tourists and one civilian, constituted religion-based targeted killings.
此次法律程序針對哈菲茲·塞義德的個人身份,以及他作為「虔誠軍」(LeT)及其附屬組織「抵抗陣線」(TRF)領導者的身份。NIA引用了1967年的《非法活動(防止)法》及2023年的《印度法典》(Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita),特別指控其對印度國家發動戰爭及策劃跨境陰謀。這份補充文件擴展了於2025年12月15日提交的一份1,597頁主文件,該文件已確立2025年4月22日襲擊的行動框架。該局聲稱,此次導致25名遊客與1名平民死亡的事件,構成了基於宗教的針對性殺戮。
Evidence synthesized by the NIA indicates a structured command hierarchy directed from Pakistan. The investigation identified Sajid Saifullah Jatt as a primary handler who coordinated logistics, including the transmission of geographic coordinates via the Alpine Quest application and the provision of weaponry. Forensic analysis of mobile devices, corroborated by manufacturer data from Xiaomi, suggests the hardware was procured in Pakistan. Furthermore, the agency documented the movements of three operatives—Faisal Jatt, Habeeb Tahir, and Hamza Afghani—the latter of whom was neutralized during Operation Mahadev in July 2025. The probe also highlighted the complicity of local residents, Parvaiz Ahmad and Bashir Ahmad Jothatd, who provided shelter and failed to notify authorities of the operatives' presence.
NIA彙整的證據顯示,存在一個由巴基斯坦導向的結構化指揮體系。調查確定薩吉德·賽富拉·賈特為主要接頭人,負責協調物流,包括透過Alpine Quest應用程式傳送地理座標及提供武器。對行動裝置的鑑識分析,經小米製造商數據證實,顯示硬體是在巴基斯坦採購的。此外,該局記錄了三名特工——法依薩爾·賈特、哈比卜·塔希爾與哈姆扎·阿富汗人的行蹤,後者於2025年7月的「馬哈德夫行動」中被消滅。調查還揭露了當地居民帕爾維茲·艾哈邁德與巴希爾·艾哈邁德·喬塔德的共犯行為,兩人提供了庇護且未將特工的存在通知當局。
Historically, the NIA notes that Saeed utilizes charitable fronts, such as Jamaat-ud-Dawa and the Falah-e-Insaniyat Foundation, to facilitate financial flows and radicalization. The geopolitical repercussions of the Pahalgam attack were manifested in Operation Sindoor, commenced on May 7, 2025, involving strikes against military and terrorist infrastructure in Pakistan and Pakistan-occupied Kashmir, which persisted until a ceasefire was established on May 10, 2025.
從歷史上看,NIA指出塞義德利用慈善掩護組織,如「達瓦軍」與「人類福利基金會」,以便利資金流動與激進化。帕哈尔甘襲擊的地緣政治影響體現於2025年5月7日開始的「辛杜爾行動」,包括對巴基斯坦及巴基斯坦佔領的克什米爾地區軍事與恐怖分子基礎設施進行打擊,直到2025年5月10日達成停火協議。
Conclusion
The NIA maintains an active investigation to further delineate the extent of Pakistani state sponsorship of terrorism within Indian territory.
NIA正維持積極調查,以進一步釐清巴基斯坦政府在印度領土內支持恐怖主義的程度。
Vocabulary Learning
The Architecture of 'Nominalization' and Legal Precision
To bridge the gap from B2 to C2, a student must move beyond describing actions and start describing concepts. This text is a masterclass in Nominalization—the process of turning verbs (actions) or adjectives (qualities) into nouns to create a dense, objective, and formal academic register.
◈ The C2 Shift: From Process to Entity
Compare these two conceptualizations of the same event:
- B2 (Action-oriented): The NIA investigated how the attack happened and found that the state of Pakistan sponsored it.
- C2 (Nominalized/Abstract): The NIA maintains an active investigation to further delineate the extent of Pakistani state sponsorship...
In the C2 version, "sponsorship" (noun) replaces "sponsored" (verb). This allows the writer to treat a complex political action as a discrete entity that can be measured, delineated, or analyzed. This is the hallmark of high-level jurisprudence and diplomatic writing.
◈ Linguistic Deconstruction: The 'Heavy' Noun Phrase
Observe the structural density of the following phrase:
*"...the formulation of cross-border conspiracies"
Instead of saying "they conspired across borders" (Simple Subject + Verb + Adverb), the text uses a complex noun phrase.
Why this is C2 Mastery:
- Precision: "Formulation" suggests a deliberate, structured process of planning, which is more precise than the generic verb "to plan."
- Distance: By removing the human subject (the conspirators) and focusing on the concept (the formulation), the tone becomes clinically objective—essential for legal dossiers.
◈ Lexical Precision: 'The Collocation of Power'
C2 fluency is not about "big words," but about collocational accuracy. Note the surgical pairing of terms in the text:
- : You don't just "show" sponsorship; you delineate its extent (mapping the exact boundaries of responsibility).
- : Not just "organized," but structured, implying a rigid, military-grade chain of command.
- : Repercussions don't just "happen"; they manifest (become visible/tangible through specific actions like Operation Sindoor).
The C2 takeaway: To evolve your writing, stop focusing on who did what (B2/C1) and start focusing on what phenomenon occurred (C2). Shift your verbs into nouns to create a sophisticated, analytical distance.