The United Nations General Assembly recently hosted a contentious debate concerning the United States embargo on Cuba, occurring amidst a systemic collapse of the Cuban electrical grid.

聯合國大會最近就美國對古巴實施禁運舉行了一場激烈的辯論，而當時古巴的電網正處於系統性崩潰狀態。

The discourse was precipitated by a series of nationwide power failures in Cuba, the most recent of which affected approximately 10 million citizens. Cuban Foreign Minister Bruno Rodríguez characterized the U.S. restriction of fuel shipments as a 'non-conventional war' and an 'energy siege' equivalent to a naval blockade. He asserted that such measures constitute an act of war intended to destabilize the state, citing cumulative economic losses of $178.7 billion since the embargo's inception and $8 billion in the most recent annual period. This position was supported by the People's Republic of China, with spokesperson Mao Ning condemning U.S. 'coercion and pressure,' and by the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights, Volker Turk, who linked sanctions to acute medical shortages and increased infant mortality.

這次討論是由古巴一系列全國性停電引起的，最近一次影響了約 1,000 萬名公民。古巴外長 Bruno Rodríguez 將美國限制燃料運輸形容為「非傳統戰爭」以及等同於海軍封鎖的「能源圍困」。他聲稱這些措施是一種旨在令國家不穩的戰爭行為，並指出自禁運開始以來，累計經濟損失達 1,787 億美元，而最近一年損失了 80 億美元。這個立場得到了中華人民共和國的支持，發言人毛寧譴責美國的「脅迫與壓力」；聯合國人權事務高級專員 Volker Turk 亦支持此觀點，將制裁與嚴重醫療短缺及嬰兒死亡率上升聯繫在一起。

Conversely, the United States delegation, led by Ambassador Mike Waltz and Representative Jeffrey Bartos, rejected the blockade allegations. Ambassador Waltz contended that the primary restriction on the Cuban populace is an internal embargo imposed by the communist government. He attributed the economic instability to systemic corruption and the influence of GAESA, a military-run conglomerate estimated by the U.S. to hold $18 billion in assets. Furthermore, the U.S. highlighted the continued arrival of humanitarian aid from the European Union, China, Russia, and other nations, as well as U.S. commodity assistance totaling approximately $500 million annually. Representative Bartos further questioned the fiscal utility of the General Assembly session, suggesting that the $84,000 expenditure for the meeting would be more effectively allocated toward direct humanitarian relief for Cuban citizens.

相反，由大使 Mike Waltz 與代表 Jeffrey Bartos 領率的美國代表團否認封鎖指控。Waltz 大使認為，古巴人民面臨的主要限制是由共產黨政府強加的內部禁運。他將經濟不穩歸咎於系統性腐敗以及軍方經營的集團 GAESA 的影響，美國估計該集團擁有 180 億美元資產。此外，美國強調來自歐盟、中國、俄羅斯及其他國家的人道主義援助持續抵達，而美國每年提供約 5 億美元的商品援助。Bartos 代表進一步質疑大會會議的財政效用，認為 84,000 美元的會議開支如果直接用於古巴公民的人道救濟會更有效。

Stakeholder positioning reveals a profound divergence in causality. While Havana and its allies attribute the humanitarian crisis to external economic asphyxiation—exacerbated by the cessation of Venezuelan crude shipments following the detention of President Nicolas Maduro—Washington maintains that the crisis is a consequence of internal mismanagement and political repression. This tension was manifested physically during the proceedings, where members of the Cuban delegation utilized percussive desk-banging to interrupt U.S. representatives, an action Ambassador Waltz characterized as a reflection of the silencing of dissent within Cuba.

利益相關者的立場顯示出對因果關係的深刻分歧。雖然哈瓦那及其盟友將人道危機歸咎於外部經濟窒息——在委內瑞拉總統 Nicolas Maduro 被拘留導致原油運輸停止後情況更加惡化——但華盛頓堅持認為危機是內部管理不善與政治壓迫的結果。這種緊張氣氛在會議期間具體化，古巴代表團成員以拍桌方式中斷美國代表發言，Waltz 大使將這個動作形容為古巴內部壓制異議的反映。

The situation remains characterized by a diplomatic impasse, with Cuba seeking international intervention against sanctions while the U.S. maintains that regime failure is the sole driver of the island's instability.

局勢依然處於外交僵局，古巴尋求國際干預以對抗制裁，而美國則堅持政權失敗是島上不穩的唯一原因。